Babić has been inventing and developing as a lone inventor, for most of his life. Refusing to become involved in corporate environments of any complexion and unhampered by the demands of having to toe the line of someone else's say so, he has been able to create a most diverse portfolio of inventions and innovations. A London University graduate in sciences he has an insatiable interest in how things work and how they could work in alternative ways which has resulted in a prolific portfolio of inventions with a proven track record of world class innovative ideas. The deluge of inventions extend to scientific works, chemical mechanisms on how cement damages skin, composites materials, studies into material behaviour under weathering stress, how asbestos fibre and other particulates contaminate given cell populations (the capillary bed hypotheses), high temperature tolerating building materials, pyro-technology, engineering projects such as 4 way catalytic converters, jet engine 3 way catalyses, jet engine combustion chamber pressure controlling mechanisms, liquid gas homogeneity and fuel air homogenizers. heat exchangers, medical, cosmetic, sailing technology and other.

As an example of the processes that go on in an inventors mind any number of examples can be quoted but given that inventors are concept developers and compilers of disparate bits of information that end up in new innovation, most of their work is to do with resolving conceptual principals rather than implementing fine detail. It is true to say that very few original concepts end up on the market stall in exactly the way that they were conceived. Manufacturers always make further innovations to adapt the concept to manufacturing regimes.

The patented direct impact technology demonstrates well the process by which innovations evolve. The concept of direct impact on catalyst coated surfaces was resolved when a hose accidentally directed the water flow onto the side of a house. The resolution of the back pressures problem created by molecules bouncing off surfaces following impaction and deflecting oncoming molecules was only resolved by subdividing the quantity of molecules in the flow stream. Reducing the number of molecular impactions in any one flow stream reduced collisions to a level where most of the molecules impacted on surfaces, making direct contact with the surface transferring energy to impaction sites. Exceptionally effective catalytic converters, heat exchangers etc become possible and far exceed the efficacy of the very best currently available systems. Once the concept is presented the details of the designs can then be innovated to provide many new products.

With more sophisticated problems such as how to tap and use the earth's magnetic field or gravitational force to make machines that can work on any stellar body, inventors are likely to challenge known facts. For example, Babić has ever since his student days, been trying to stimulate discussion on the possibility that atomic structure is based on the wrong premise. The universally accepted model of atomic structure where electrons move about the space of an atom in a balances state of kinetic and magnetic flux, simply does not work. He is proposing an alternative way of understanding subatomic relationships and has been trying to present the "Aggregated Model of Atomic Structure".

The relationship between mass and energy is being challenged wherein there is no interaction between mass and energy other than that the number of discrete energies are aggregated within the field confines of any given subatomic particle ie mass does not increase as energy increases but the number of mass particles contained within a given field envelope varies.

What is proposed is that for instance, the electron in its ground state absorbs energy to achieve an exited state which reflects its higher energy and then at some stage, releases a photon of energy to fall back to its ground state. Depending on how much energy the electron release to attain a stable energy state as to the nature of the energy quanta released. As an example, electrons as they fall to their ground states can release light energy or even x-rays. The photons of energy released are not a process of mass and energy interchanging but simply quanta of energy that were contained within the electromagnetic field escaping the reduced field strength. The electron then is an aggregated energy composite that is capable of absorbing and releasing parcels of energy.

The aggregation of energy parcels is also reflected in the proton and neutron wherein the energy states are at a much higher level than the energy states of the electron field. In unstable atoms, nuclear components are seen to release very high energy parcels such as gamma rays. The basic concept of the aggregated model is that the nuclear bodies such as the proton and neutron have a much stronger electromagnetic fields which can contain a much larger number of energy parcels than the electron field and that the neutron contains more energy trapped within its electromagnetic envelope than a proton. Protons and neutrons also trap disparate energy parcels.

Electromagnetic fields generated by subatomic particles are the key to atomic structure and being irreconcilable at all know conditions in the universe, they aggregate within energy envelopes. The fields exercise conditions that provide the framework for the atomic structure. For example, the electron and the proton have irreconcilably similar fields that repel each other but at the same time they are attracted by the difference in their charge. The attraction and repulsion of the forces involved results in an optimum arrangement that holds the electron directly above and perpendicular to the proton and there is a resonance away and toward the proton but the electron does not circumnavigate the proton in the conventionally conceived manner. The electron does not collapse into the proton because the field it generates is irreconcilable with that generated by the proton and only when enough energy is provided can the electron penetrate the nuclear field to be trapped within the proton's electromagnetic field to counterbalance the positive charge and become a neutron.

What is obvious from the aggregated model is that subatomic particles absorb energy of varying frequencies but emit energy of a given frequency. This means that the atom is an electromagnetic processing facility wherein the subatomic particles are the plant that processes, releases or stores electromagnetic energy.

In the simplest atomic structure of hydrogen the electron and proton form a stable energy state which contains a given number of energy parcels that form a stable structural arrangement. If another proton and electron is added to such a construct then there is twice the number of energy parcels trapped within the field of the subatomic particles and therefore the helium atom contains twice as much energy as hydrogen. When additional subatomic particles such as neutrons are added to the atom the total energy contained within the atom is the sum of the individual energy particles contained in all the subatomic parcels. The list of increasing atomic numbers forms the Periodic Table that is in effect a tabulation of stable energy states.

It may well be that some of the anomalies in chemical reactivity of elements may be better understood in terms of total aggregated energy rather than electron configurations and that chemical bonds are more to do with field interactions than electron sharing.

As always with science, to think you know something is very different from providing methodology that allows scientific testing and reproducible confirmation.

For inventors to design novel concepts they often question the status qua and are not fearful of failure but will try and fail, rather than not try at all. Most of the creative work generated is rejected and of all innovations that go as far as being submitted for patent grant about half are refused patents because of prior art. Of the granted patents only about 2% actually make some money for inventors and of those that are commercially successful, after ten years or so on the market only about 1% continue to be productive. Creative people who set out to invent something and make millions are more likely to lose their money, their homes, families, friends and even their freedom, then they are to become rich. The creative community is littered with sad cases and not only where inventions fail but also in cases where inventions emerge that are of outstanding commercial value for then, all sorts of criminally minded, corrupt ugly things crawl out of the woodwork.

In 2002 The International Institute of Inventors elected Babić to the Daedalus Society. He was honoured to receive the Gold Medal and to have become a member of a Society that is restricted to 100 inventors world wide, at any one time.

Daedalus Society
Gold Medal

Note:
We also look to publish our technology in newspapers and magazines and to project the story of lone inventors. The world of business acknowledges the uselessness of Patents and Confidentiality Agreements and the unworkable formalities set by the World patenting system. The cost of patenting World wide, policing and enforcing IP rights is impossible for lone inventors and small businesses and theft of IP is extensive so that the creative are frequently abused. Prohibitive costs are involved in protecting granted patents in Civil Courts. Inventors the world over are working to change the Laws relating to patents. In particular, lone inventors and small and medium sized companies are extensively involved in attempting to change the Intellectual Property Law so as to transfer theft of Intellectual Property from Civil Courts to Criminal Courts. We would welcome any opportunity to publish articles on the overwhelming problems lone inventors and small companies have to cope with.