Light Pollution: Chapter Two
An article on Light Pollution
experiments in and around the St Austell area, by Tara Hill
Back to Chapter One
Methodology
Equipment
Star Maps Site Map of St Austell Torch with a red light Pencil and Recording
Chart Car Warm Clothing
Star Maps
For use in the field the maps provided on the Redshift 4 CD ROM were easy to
read in the dark.
Initially the survey was to include constellations looking North, South, East
and West. This was not possible, as the directions could not be matched with
constellations on the website. Therefore, the altitudes of the constellations
were chosen instead.
Various constellations were chosen and referenced with Redshift CD ROM to
ensure their suitability for observing from the St Austell area (Longitude 4 47
W and Latitude 50 20 N). Two practice sessions were performed which resulted in
the following constellations to be used: Gemini; Orion; Ursa Minor and Leo. They
were chosen because their altitudes were close to 20 degrees, 40 degrees and 60
degrees at the time of the survey, these different altitudes gave a good even
range over the sky.
Other constellations such as Pegasus were considered but on observing them, I
realised the lowest reference star would be setting quite early in the observing
session. Gemini stayed quite close to the 60 degree mark most of the session as
did Orion at the 20 degree mark, however two constellations, Ursa Minor and Leo
were used for 40 degrees as Ursa Minor moved quite a distance from the 40 degree
mark and it was felt it would not give an accurate reading to use it after 2130
GMT. This movement of the stars including the Sun is known as sidereal rotation
and is not the actual stars moving but the Earth rotating on it's axis every 24
hours.
 |
| Stars
seen in Triangle |
Limiting
Magnitude |
| 5 |
4.3 |
| 6 |
4.4 |
| 7 |
4.8 |
| 8 |
4.8 |
| 9 |
5.5 |
|
| Table 1a |
Table 1b |
Explanation of Data Collection
Star charts were prepared before the observing session. To explain this
method it is necessary to study the star charts showing the constellation Orion,
(Tables 1a and 1b above) which is used as an example. Three stars are used as corner
indicators for the triangle - Rigel (constellation Orion), Nihal (constellation
Lepus) and Scetum (constellation Eridanus). The stars which are visible within
the triangle (including the corner stars) are counted. The number of stars can
then be used to determine the limiting magnitude of that area of sky, at that
site. For example, if 6 stars were observed a limiting magnitude of 4.4 would be
the result for that site.
Torch
A torch with a red beam was used as this does not disturb the dark adaptation
of the eyes as much as a white beamed torch would. Dark adaptation is necessary
for this experiment and on the website 30 minutes was recommended. This would
have been okay if only one observation was taking place but due to the nature of
the survey and six sites it was felt that 15 minutes would be adequate. It was
still quite difficult to find good sites due to car headlights and security
lights coming on halfway through the dark adaptation period.
Systematic Sampling
A map of St Austell was produced, and a circle of
a 4 mile radius was marked on the map with St Austell railway station being the
central point. It was at first thought eight sites could be used for sampling,
but after some calculations this would have taken 41/2 to 5 hours to complete.
Instead six sites were used taken just 31/2 hours. The results from this showed
extinction of star light was taking place, this was known at the time of
observing (15.02.02) as skyglow was evident. Having proved that light pollution
existed it was decided to try four more sites closer to the town centre, at a
radius of two miles. Depending on the site and orientation it could possibly
distinguish how much extinction was lost due to other sources other than St
Austell town centre itself.

Map Two shows St Austell and surrounding area. On it are the observing sites
marked A to J. A,B,C,D,E and F represent the sites that were observed from on
the 15.02.02. These sites are at a distance of 4 miles ( where possible) from St
Austell railway station. G,H,I and J represent the sites that were observed from
on the 16.02.02 at a distance of 2 miles from St Austell railway station.
The sites do not form perfect circles as St Austell is a coastal town and in
some areas it was impossible to observe the full distance from St Austell
railway station due to the sea. Other sites show irregularities due to the view
being obscured by lights, buildings or trees.
Data Collection and Recording
Table 2a
Results of observations taken on 15, February 2002. Humidity 93%
| TIme |
Site |
Con |
No of Stars |
Lim
Mag |
Altitude |
Natural Extinction |
Corrected Lim Mag |
Ave Lim Mag |
Mag Lost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 1950 |
Nanpean (A) |
Orion |
7 |
4.50 |
26 |
0.30 |
4.80 |
6.00 |
1.20 |
| 1950 |
Nanpean (A) |
U.Minor |
3 |
3.90 |
35 |
0.20 |
4.10 |
6.00 |
1.90 |
| 1950 |
Nanpean (A) |
Gemini |
6 |
5.00 |
55 |
0.00 |
5.00 |
6.00 |
1.00 |
| 2030 |
Bugle (B) |
Orion |
5 |
4.30 |
24 |
0.35 |
4.65 |
6.00 |
1.35 |
| 2030 |
Bugle (B) |
U Minor |
3 |
3.90 |
37 |
0.15 |
4.05 |
6.00 |
1.95 |
| 2030 |
Bugle (B) |
Gemini |
7 |
5.10 |
61 |
0.00 |
5.10 |
6.00 |
0.90 |
| 2100 |
St Blazey (C) |
Orion |
6 |
4.40 |
23 |
0.35 |
4.75 |
6.00 |
1.25 |
| 2100 |
St Blazey (C) |
U Minor |
4 |
5.20 |
40 |
0.15 |
5.35 |
6.00 |
0.65 |
| 2100 |
St Blazey (C) |
Gemini |
7 |
5.10 |
65 |
0.00 |
5.10 |
6.00 |
0.90 |
| 2130 |
Porthpean (D) |
Orion |
8 |
4.80 |
22 |
0.40 |
5.20 |
6.00 |
0.80 |
| 2130 |
Porthpean (D) |
U Minor |
3 |
3.90 |
42 |
0.10 |
4.00 |
6.00 |
2.00 |
| 2130 |
Porthpean (D) |
Gemini |
7 |
5.10 |
67 |
0.00 |
5.10 |
6.00 |
0.90 |
| 2200 |
Pentewan (E) |
Orion |
8 |
4.80 |
19 |
0.50 |
5.30 |
6.00 |
0.70 |
| 2200 |
Pentewan (E) |
Leo |
7 |
4.40 |
34 |
0.20 |
4.60 |
6.00 |
1.40 |
| 2200 |
Pentewan (E) |
Gemini |
8 |
5.30 |
69 |
0.00 |
5.30 |
6.00 |
0.70 |
| 2230 |
Hewaswater (F) |
Orion |
7 |
4.50 |
16 |
0.70 |
5.20 |
6.00 |
0.80 |
| 2230 |
Hewaswater (F) |
Leo |
8 |
5.00 |
39 |
0.10 |
5.10 |
6.00 |
0.90 |
| 2230 |
Hewaswater (F) |
Gemini |
8 |
5.30 |
69 |
0.00 |
5.30 |
6.00 |
0.70 |
Table 2b
Results of observations taken on 16, February 2002. Humidity 93%
| Time |
Site |
Con |
No of Stars |
Lim Mag |
Alt |
Natural Extinction |
Corrected Lim mag |
Avg Lim Mag |
Mag |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 2015 |
Charlestown (G) |
Orion |
6 |
4.40 |
26 |
0.30 |
4.70 |
6.00 |
1.30 |
| 2015 |
Charlestown (G) |
U Minor |
3 |
3.90 |
37 |
0.15 |
4.05 |
6.00 |
1.95 |
| 2015 |
Charlestown (G) |
Gemini |
6 |
5.00 |
60 |
0.00 |
5.00 |
6.00 |
1.00 |
| 2035 |
London Ap (H) |
Orion |
7 |
4.50 |
26 |
0.30 |
4.80 |
6.00 |
1.20 |
| 2035 |
London Ap (H) |
U Minor |
3 |
3.90 |
38 |
0.15 |
4.05 |
6.00 |
1.95 |
| 2035 |
London Ap (H) |
Gemini |
6 |
5.00 |
62 |
0.00 |
5.00 |
6.00 |
1.00 |
| 2055 |
Trewoon (I) |
Orion |
6 |
4.40 |
25 |
0.30 |
4.70 |
6.00 |
1.30 |
| 2055 |
Trewoon (I) |
U Minor |
3 |
3.90 |
40 |
0.15 |
4.05 |
6.00 |
1.95 |
| 2055 |
Trewoon (I) |
Gemini |
7 |
5.10 |
65 |
0.00 |
5.10 |
6.00 |
0.90 |
| 2130 |
Trethurgy (J) |
Orion |
4 |
4.30 |
23 |
0.35 |
4.65 |
6.00 |
1.35 |
| 2130 |
Trethurgy (J) |
U Minor |
3 |
3.90 |
42 |
0.10 |
4.00 |
6.00 |
2.00 |
| 2130 |
Trethurgy (J) |
Gemini |
7 |
5.10 |
67 |
0.00 |
5.10 |
6.00 |
0.90 |
The results were recorded on a chart designed on Microsoft Works Office,
spreadsheet program. Using the titles: date; humidity; time (GMT);
constellation; number of stars and site; limiting magnitude was also on the
sheet but not necessary for the observing session.
Explanation of Data Entry
The following steps explain
the tables 2a and 2b.
Step 1
Number of Stars were counted
Step 2
Limiting magnitude was calculated using star charts and information from
tables 1a and 1b
Step 3
Altitude needs to be taken into account. The reason for this is the closer
your view to the horizon, the thicker the atmosphere. More scattering of light
occurs nearer the horizon as more water droplets are present. The altitude was
calculated by using Redshift 4. This was done by taking the lowest star altitude
from the highest, therefore giving the midway point of the survey area.
Step 4
Natural extinction of starlight does happen on a limited scale( Interview -
Brian Sheen 10, Feb 2002). The following information was used to account for the
natural extinction.
Altitude Degrees Dimming in Magnitudes
|
Altitude
Degrees
|
Dimming in Magnitudes
|
|
1
|
2
|
|
2
|
2.5
|
|
4
|
2
|
|
10
|
1
|
|
13
|
0.8
|
|
15
|
0.7
|
|
17
|
0.6
|
|
21
|
0.4
|
|
26
|
0.3
|
|
32
|
0.2
|
|
43
|
0.1
|
Above 45 degrees the amount of natural extinction is negligible. (Patrick
Moore, 1964).
Step 5
Corrected limiting magnitude was calculated by adding the natural extinction
figure to the limiting magnitude.
Step 6
The average limiting magnitude is what a person with good eyesight would
expect to see from a dark observing site.
Step 7
Magnitude lost was calculated by taking the corrected limiting magnitude from
the average limiting magnitude.
Other Equipment
A pencil was used to record the results. Pens are not useful with this type
of work as they usually stop working in very cold conditions.
A car was necessary for this survey, as 45 miles was covered on the first
night alone.
Warm clothing for this survey especially in February is advisable, as the
discomfort of the cold will affect the observers results.
Other Factors to be Taken into Account
Phase of the Moon
The phase of the Moon is an important consideration. When the Moon is full it
produces a lot of light drowning out the fainter stars in it's glow. Therefore,
the survey had to take place a week either side of New Moon when it was only a
crescent. In February the New Moon was 12th February, on the 15th and 16th the
Moon was a small crescent setting early in the survey.
Weather
The sky had to be clear of clouds for an accurate result. On both observing
nights the humidity was 93% (Ref: www.weather.co.uk 15.02.02 and 16.02.02),
which seemed quite high. The observing took place with clear skies, however sea
mist was apparent on coastal sites.
Forward to Chapter Three
|