Comments on work of C H Thompson

24:3:98 to August 1999

Steven Rado, http://www.aethro-kinematics.com/, 24 Mar 1998:

  • where were you in all my life when I was working as a hermit nobody to talk to?
    •

    Ana Maria Cetto and Luis de la Peņa, 14:4:98 email, re "Tangled Methods" paper:

  • he asked me to tell you that he values very much your fight for the recovery of acceptable and honest standards in science; you are a good example to follow, unfortunately a rara avis in present days.

    • Stan Byers, http://www.netcom.com/~sbyers11, April 22 1998:

  • From my browsing via DejaNews on the internet you appear as the most active champion of the requirement for pursuing a prime cause for physical phenomena. Your type of effort should work wonders in leading current physics away from the vogue spooky science cults, GR, SR and QM

    • Alan Pendleton, http://www.geocities.com/Athens/2740/, 14:4:98 email:

  • Thanks for the paper. Very well argued, I think. I especially like the concluding sentence: "This is not fair on the outside world, which is quite unnecessarily being subjected to the nonsense of teleportation, time-travel, wormholes, and all the other paraphernalia of dogma gone wrong." Very true, and I hadn't thought of it that way before.

    • Karl Thompson wrote, 4:5:98:

  • caroline: I'm proud of you. That's the best set of arguments yet! I cede experiment knowledge to you. Somewhere I've already got the EPR, (aspect and the clauser) physical review letters, on file. I hadn't realized you were as thoroughly a quantum physics person as i've seen today. Your arguments are basically sound but i don't totally agree with you. In fact, they are downright good from your point of view!

    • Milo Wolff, http://www.sirius.com/~flapjack/milo/, 25:5:98:

  • Anyway, I have read your thoughts several times in various places and I like the way you think! You are logical, curious, and honest with your ideas

    • Al Kelly (see papers at http://www.net4you.co.at/dr-ing-J-Schulz/), 7:6:98:

  • You are being read around the globe,

    • Steven Rado (again), 31:7:98:

  • Thinking of each and everyone of your learned, witty, smart, sharp, imaginative, intuitive, plausible, and even possibly true ideas, I can not help missing a Basic Operating Manual, or a 'no-matter-how-sketchy' blue print, that would show where to put what, in your unique Carolinean system. Only by comprehending your story would I be able to tell, which idea, in my subjective opinion, does not fit with the other in your unique picture.

    • Francis J Grimer, f.grimer@grimer2.freeserve.co.uk, 8:11:98:

  • [Re my Tangled Methods paper and a quote from Simone Weil]

    Well, it's nice to know we've got one hero(ine), anyway :-)

    •

    9:11:98 More from Grimer:

  • Ooo, I dunno. How does it go?

    "For this was I born, and for this came I into the world; that I should give testimony to the truth. Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice."

    Anyone who cares about Truth qualifies for sainthood in my book :-)

    •

    11:11:98 And more from Grimer:

  • I must confess, I don't really understand what you're saying - but I do love the way you're saying it :-)

    • Lee.Shimmin@waii.com, 13:11:98

  • Thank you for sending me a copy of your paper on quantum entanglement. It hit me like a breath of fresh air. I am so pleased that you are delving into this business. I believe you are absolutely on the right track. I want to know more. I want to know about the various "anomalies" that support your case. Believe it or not, there are many other things in modern physics that are as full of holes as a Swiss cheese.

    • Francis Grimer, yet again, 15:11:98

  • You might be interested to know how I found your website. I joined the NPA [Natural Philosophy Alliance] earlier this year and browsed one or two sites which didn't impress. Recently I decided to be a bit more systematic and found the NPA members page, I thought I'd start from the end (at school I always cheated by working back from the answer) and I noticed it was a woman's name. That's good I thought. A woman's less likely to be a nutcase. I wasn't disappointed!

    • "Prof. Adriano Orefice" orefice@imiucca.csi.unimi.it, 19:11:98:

  • Don't you think it would be better to struggle on a single front, and to drive a nail at a time? I believe that the simple demolition of Aspect's (or Tittel's) analysis would be enough for a Nobel prize!

    • Michael Foster, 28:11:98

  • After having read your various papers as published on your web site, I feel compelled to comment. You express with cogent clarity a thesis which confirms a suspicion I have had for years, which is that physicists have become a Cabal concerned with counting angels on the head of a pin. In support of quantum theory and the "standard model", there seems to be no extreme to which they will not go to flout the facts and stretch the truth. I do not suspect malice or conscious dishonesty here, only the normal human failings. After all, these fellows must have their grant money.

    • Lee.Shimmin@waii.com, 4:12:98:

  • I can't say enough about the good work you are doing. Please never allow yourself to get discouraged.

    • "Vladimir Z. Nuri" vznuri@netcom.com, 4:12:98:

  • ok well thanks for your ideas as always, they are scrumptious and tasty.. we will triumph, maybe in 1-5 yrs, maybe 10, maybe after we are dead, but we will triumph<g> as mathematician Hilbert said once, "we must know!! we will know!!"

    • Jeff Kaylin, 7:1:99:

  • I periodically visit your web site. When you make changes, it would be nice to know what changed. Perhaps you could have a revision list I could click on. Also a little biography of you describing your current projects would be interesting. And how can I support you in your efforts?
    • Franco Selleri, 19:1:99:
  • I am pleased by the very positive comments to your work. By the way, I am also curious about you. Your attitude toward science is absolutely correct and as you know I always agreed with you on this.

    • "Vesselin I. Dimitrov" vesko@phys.uni-sofia.bg, 2:2:99:

  • A couple of weeks ago I discovered your site, following some links from Trevor Marshall's pages, and I find what you have done and are doing deserving any support one can think of. … If you think that I could be of some use in the fight against stupidity, please let me know. I am really amazed at what you are doing.

    • "Prof. Adriano Orefice" orefice@imiucca.csi.unimi.it (again), 9:2:99, re Tangled Methods:

  • I repeat, your paper is a (literary) masterpiece. It was a real pleasure to read it.

    • Alastair Couper aquarius@ccmaui.net, 19:2:99

  • There are the particle-contact guys, the waves in elastic medium folk, the neoPlatonist geometry folks (I tend that way at times), and the complete abstractionists, and ... Then I wake up and realize that experiments are what drives it all, and I should concentrate there.

    I guess you know that too. So I wish you best luck in your upcoming

    •

    Mountain Man http://magna.com.au/~prfbrown/ 30:6:99

  • I believe you are onto something with your well-considered work, and I would like to see both it and you succeed. 

    • Christian Ricordeau http://pro.wanadoo.fr/quatuor/ 30:8:99

    Return to front page