REPORTS FROM MEETINGS - eMail
yours...
Dfee Conference in Bristol
24 November 98
Joint
Meeting of CUBA Partnership Chairs & senior officers 8 December 98
Dave reports.. again blame me if I've got it wrong - I know some issues are
rather delicate, but..
This was a useful informal run though of where each Partnership was at, and
discussion of the overlapping issues facing the Partnerships. A list of the CUBA Chairs is now available. The following headings were
used (details to be added when I get time).
 | Existing work & state of Partnerships - A run though was
provided. [to add when I have time]. A very different range of approaches from
using Financial consultants (N Somerset) to simply employing more in-house staff. |
 | Information Service - Need for some common CUBA threads - as
well as upgrading of ALIS system (though concerns at affect of SSA settlements) - due to
parents expectations across boundaries. SGC concerned at high cost of APN (so looking to
review in medium term). BANES & N Somerset not using APN. With DfEE model web pages
and growing electronic pages - the key issue is who will keep the data up to date? I'm not
entirely sure all the other authorities fully understand the appendix guidance and CHIC
model. Learning Partnership West expressing interest - but not in keeping data up to
date(!?! - isn't this the very problem why the TAP initiative failed?). Agreed on need to
get TEC/ Health Authority & Employment Service contributing (as well as N Somerset
& BANES) - i.e. a lot more groups paying for a basic service level. Issues of longer
hours? freephone? & availability of top up services to be discussed further. Bristol
to circulate draft specification. |
 | Development Agents - None of the 3 other Councils appear to see
OSCA within their development plans at present - preferring to support more local
development services (Springboard in N Som; Children's Playlink in SGC; and BAND
generally) and/or employ development staff directly. Some concerns re how OSCA places/
training tie in with existing Plans, local knowledge, and overall quality of approach.
Strength felt to be in business planning rather than necessarily responding sensitively to
helping parents. Current funding: £140k central CUBA (with £30k TEC top up)(plus
£60k for training) for some 6 staff. Need for greater info on management (ie relationship
to TEC and Equalities Foundation) and budget details. A theme emerged of TEC as
facilitator - not doer. Need to manage how this develop & retain valuable links with
TEC and employer/ training sides. SGC to set up meeting with TEC CX (Richard). There was
also a useful shared reflection on other relevant agencies (PSLA, Childminding Networks,
etc). |
 | Training Strategies - General discussion - again much cross
boundary overlap although with different aspects in different areas. Agreed on need to
move towards a joint meeting with FE colleges etc in March 99 (SGC to co-ordinate). To
involve key players from Partnership (Training) Working Groups. |
 | Networking - Agreed we need to circulate newsletters/ Plans
between each CUBA Partnership. Some discussion on Regional position - and NCB officers
network. We do need to ensure that Partnership have national input to DfEE and their own
communication network. It stimulated some thoughts as to what we need to raise at Exeter
next week at NEYN meeting. |
The meeting was generally felt to be useful. We agreed on need to hold next
meeting on Tuesday 16 March (10.00am in Bristol).
[ What's on ] [ News Page ] [ Campaigns ] [ Info on Bristol ] [ Parents Page ] [ Quality ] [ The Bristol Partnership ] [ Policies ] [ Guidance ]

Dave Sutton reports: Three big items still awaited:-
 | Over 650 responses to Regulation & Inspection consultation. Summary due by
end of year. |
 | QCA Review of Desirable Learning Outcomes. Draft proposals early in New Year,
finalised Summer 99 with implementation for Sept 2000. |
 | QCA - Qualifications framework
- just out. Downloadable as pdf file. |
Not forgetting info on how 3 year olds are to be funded. (£390m over 3
years to double places from 33% to 66%). There was little info on Childcare Tax Credit.
When I raised the difficulties of no current year funding for Partnerships, I was pointed
to all the savings the Council had made from the ending of vouchers!! Whilst all the talk
is of "meaningful partnerships" the DfEE guidance regularly falls back onto
relying on LEA's at crunch points.
Of the £44m nationally (£320k odd for Bristol) for Partnerships :-
 | at least 23% needs to be allocated to pick up the current OSCI work in providing
out-of-school places and helping prepare bids for NOF (i.e. current OSCA work - though
they will be directly funded for training work). |
 | allocation needs to be made to delivery of information service (ringfenced?) |
 | the Partnership can consider organisational costs (no national model or
restrictions as yet). If employing a co-ordinator, then suggestion that it be done though
Council. |
The strategy will need to try and balance the building of the capacity &
infrastructure with the "early wins" of new places. It will require linking to
consideration of Council staffing and responsibilities and Council grants (will
Councillors resist temptation to cut?) as well as to variations in SSA (where we are still
trying to get a detailed breakdown of Bristol's £9.6m Under 5's SSA). Relying on SSA is
also questionable given that Bristol already spends in excess of SSA in both Education
(circa 12%) and Social Services (circa 20%). So whether it will really mean more actual
money to increase capacity of Inspection Unit remains to be seen.
Whilst overall the day was useful there was not a huge turnout (this was number
12 of 15 presentations) so perhaps it could have been opened up to more people (especially
from parents and providers). If anything, Partnerships seem to be operating very
differently in different areas. The timescales are still impossible - all too often we
seem to focus on the next plan and not making sure we have progressed the current Plan.
There is perhaps a danger that the speed and the stress on Quarterly returns will obscure
a bigger vision of where we want to go and how we build quality into all aspects of the
process.
|