Territorialization & the Territory

[D]iagrams must be distinguished from indexes, which are territorial signs, but also from icons, which pertain to reterritorialization, and from symbols, which pertain to relative or negative deterritorialization. [TP: 142]

Substances as formed matters refer to territorialities and degrees of territorialization and deterritorialization. But each articulation has a code and a territorality; therefore each possesses both form and substance. [TP: 41]

[T]here is no real distinction between form and substance, only a mental or modal distinction: since substances are nothing other than formed matters, formless substances are inconceivable, although it is possible in certain instances to conceive of substanceless forms. [TP: 44]

[S]ubstances, being formed matters, relate to territorialities and movements of deterritorialization and reterritorialization on the epistrata. [TP: 53]