Free JavaScripts provided by The JavaScript Source  

                                                                               

 

Latest Reports.

 

 

Select these links to read of recent developments in the Ludlow family's campaign for a public inquiry into the sectarian murder of Seamus Ludlow (aged 47), Thistlecross, Mountpleasant, County Louth, in May 1976. These accounts begin with most recent events.

Latest Reports Page 1:

 Present -  1 July 2004

Latest Reports Page 2 :

May 2004 - November 2001

Latest Reports Page 3: 

   

 

 Visitors are invited to leave messages of support on our Guest Book

3 July 2002 - The Irish Attorney General has directed the Coroner for County Louth to hold a fresh inquest into the death of Seamus Ludlow.  . . . . Please return for updates and important developments.

Latest Revised: November 01, 2005 .

29 May 2004: See The Dundalk Democrat report, Ludlow inquest before the end of July for the latest on the fresh inquest for Seamus Ludlow.

I Top I

22 May 2004: The 30th anniversary of the murderous Dublin and Monaghan bombings of 17 May 1974, in which 34 people, including an unborn child, were killed by loyalist car bombs, was recalled in an Editorial (A Quiet Anniversary) in the local weekly newspaper, The Dundalk Democrat:  

The anniversary of the Dublin and Monaghan bombings passed this week with very little of the publicity which surrounded the atrocities 30 years ago. There was a wreath laying ceremony at the simple and beautiful memorial on Talbot Street. An taoiseach Bertie Ahern was there with other dignitaries, but the most important in attendance were the survivors and relatives of those who lost their lives in what is still the biggest act of terrorism and loss of life in Ireland during the Troubles.

The three car bombs went off within minutes of each other shortly before 5.30pm on May 17 1974. Men, women and children were killed or dreadfully mutilated in the bombings, which carried no warnings.

Less than an hour later, in Monaghan town, more lives were lost when another bomb exploded. It is hard for younger people to imagine the scene of devastation and the sense of shock which reverberated around Ireland that day. . .

There are those in Dundalk who too know all about unanswered questions. Maura McKeever, who lost her father, Jack Rooney, and Margaret Watters, whose father, Hugh Watters, was also murdered in the Dundalk bombing of 1975 know what it's like not to know.

The Ludlow and Sharkey families are still waiting for answers about Seamus Ludlow, whose murder remains one of the Troubles most murky episodes.

A full public inquiry is the only solution. It has to be asked what the government is afraid of. What are they hiding and what do they know about the shady goings-on that led to these murders and their aftermath?

Huge expense is being lavished on tribunals of inquiry into dodgy planning and political backhanders. Although these are important matters, it looks like the government has got its priorities wrong.

No-one died because of what Liam Lawlor or George Redmond did or didn't do. But in the very same city where those inquiries are taking place, dozens of people lost their lives 30 years ago and no-one really knows how or why.

The families of those who died in Dublin, Monaghan and Dundalk have been promised much over the last three decades, but have got little. When the Dublin and Monaghan inquests are over, it's doubtful whether the families will know any more than they did this week 30 years ago.

Use the link above to read the Editorial in full.

I Top I

20 May 2004: Writing about the much delayed fresh inquest into the death of Seamus Ludlow, in today's The Irish News (Coroner plans inquest despite Garda hold-up), Valerie Robinson, the paper's Southern Correspondent, revealed:

An inquest into the death of Seamus Ludlow looks set to take place within the next two months - despite the failure of gardai to release key documents and evidence, a coroner has said.

Louth County Coroner Ronan Maguire last night said he was determined to hold the inquest into the killing in 1976 of the Catholic forestry worker. . . , before the end of July.

He said that "one way  or the other" the inquest would take place, despite the fact that gardai have yet to hand over details of ballistics evidence and an internal Garda report compiled by Chief Superintendent Ted Murphy in 1998 into the original murder investigation.

Mr Maguire, who was ordered to hold a new inquest by Attorney General Rory Brady in July 2002, said he also hoped to meet the solicitor of the Ludlow family "quite shortly".

"I'm still waiting for information from gardai. I still haven't received information on ballistics, although I have been told it will be through shortly," he said.

Ludlow family member Jimmy Sharkey commented that the family was concerned that the coroner would be forced to adjourn the inquest pending further information from the gardai, if the force continued to refuse to cooperate fully with Mr Maguire. He accused the Garda and the Irish government of attempting to hide the truth about the killing of his late Uncle Seamus:

"The fact that there have been so many delays would suggest to us that the government has something to hide.

"We've asked repeatedly to see the internal Garda report and we've been ignored," Mr Sharkey said.

Use the link above to read the full Irish News report.

I Top I

2 May 2004: This day marks the 28th anniversary of Seamus Ludlow's foul murder: 28 years without justice and truth. It is now more than six years since four loyalist former Red Hand Commando and British Army UDR suspects were arrested by the RUC for questioning about their alleged role in this crime. They have enjoyed a further six years of freedom while the family of Seamus Ludlow continue to seek the truth behind the cover-up which still keeps them free.

The Ludlow family still waits for a second inquest that has been delayed since its formal announcement in July 2002. No formal date has been announced, though it is expected to take place before the end of 2004.

The Ludlow family also looks forward to the release of the private Barron Inquiry Report - again sometime before the end of 2004. It is hoped that the Barron Inquiry may lead to the public inquiry the Ludlow family still demands.

  Top I

31 March 2004: The Joint Oireachtas Committee has recommended that a full public inquiry into the 1974 Dublin and Monaghan bombings atrocities should be held in Britain. The Committee had held hearings over the last three months following a four-year private inquiry by retired judge Henry Barron into the bombings. Judge Barron is currently conducting similar inquiries into the Dundalk bombing and the murder of Seamus Ludlow.

The Committee, backing an inquiry in the UK, said that witnesses and those responsible for the attacks which killed 33 people as well as an unborn baby on 17 May 1974,  were likely to be outside the Irish jurisdiction. The Committee added that if the British government failed to set up an inquiry, the Irish Government should take an appeal to the European Court of Human Rights.

The Committee also called for the setting up in Dublin of two separate inquiries relating to the attacks - but, significantly not for a public inquiry in the Irish state. One inquiry should look at the original garda investigation and at why certain leads were never followed up, while another inquiry should investigate how relevant files went missing from the Department of Justice.

Margaret Urwin, spokesperson for Justice for the Forgotten, representing most of the bombings' survivors and bereaved relatives of victims, gave "very tentative welcome" to the Committee's report. She said: 

"The Committee called for answers on why key Garda files disappeared, why the original Garda investigation stopped so quickly, why an armed British army officer acting suspiciously that evening in Dublin was allowed to leave on a ferry and known suspects never pursued.

"And they have called for an international judge to be appointed. . . to be able to examine these issues across jurisdictions, just like Judge Cory with inquiries into other cases.

"Their findings now put huge pressure on Bertie Ahern to ensure Tony Blair agrees to these measures being implemented."

She added, that members of Justice for the Forgotten were "extremely disappointed" that the  Committee had stopped short of ordering a full public inquiry but welcomed its acknowledgement that further investigations were needed.

See The Irish Daily Star, 1 April 2004: Call for bombings inquiry in U.K. Dail committee reports findings.


Barron Report

Final Report on the Report of the Independent Commission of Inquiry into the Dublin and Monaghan Bombings, laid before both Houses of the Oireachtas on 31 March 2004. Full text available at http://www.irlgov.ie/oireachtas/Committees-29th-Dáil/jcjedwr-debates/BarronReportFinal.pdf

I Top I

28 February 2004: See The Dundalk Democrat articles: Murder on their mind for a further report on the Ludlow family's meeting with Mr Justice Henry Barron; and Gardai have the Ludlow bullets for comment on the new inquest that is expected to commence shortly. The County Louth Coroner, Ronan Maguire, is quoted as saying that the bullets used in the murder of Seamus Ludlow are in the hands of the Gardai. This information conflicts with previous reports that two of the bullets are missing.

I Top I

23 February 2003: Representatives of the Ludlow family had a productive two-hours meeting in Dundalk with Mr Justice Henry Barron to discuss his private inquiry into the murder of Seamus Ludlow.

It was an very interesting meeting in which the Ludlow family members asked many questions and helped clarify a few issues for the Mr Justice Barron. 

They called on him to inquire further into the whereabouts of the three bullets that were fired into Seamus Ludlow - it appears that only one can be accounted for and two are missing. It has been suggested that the missing bullets were sent north to the Northern Ireland Forensic Science Laboratory. Mr Justice Barron was also asked to inquire into the present whereabouts of Seamus Ludlow's clothing which may still provide useful DNA evidence.

Mr Justice Barron revealed that his private inquiry report will not be completed and published until later in the year. He still has many queries to get answers for. It had been hoped that his report would be completed early in 2004, but there have been delays in receiving information and more needs to be done. The Ludlow family is content to wait until Mr Justice Barron has done as thorough an investigation as is possible within his remit.

The Ludlow family looks forward to eventually seeing Justice Barron's inquiry report, but that will not be the end of the fight. There are important answers which can only be found through the medium of a public inquiry. 

However, it is hoped that Justice Barron's inquiry report will help point the way to a public inquiry.

Justice Barron's narrow remit does not give him the power to compel witnesses to meet him nor answer his questions, nor can he demand the production of documents. He can not question gardai or other important witnesses under oath and the Ludlow family can not check on the honesty or otherwise of what they tell him. Witnesses can simply refuse to meet him or answer his questions - and some have done exactly that! Mr Justice Barron can not simply walk into the Department of Justice or Garda Headquarters and see what is there for himself. Nor can he do anything about the ongoing British indifference to his inquiries.

A public inquiry - perhaps led by Mr Justice Barron himself - would have the power of subpoena over witnesses and documents. Witnesses would be questioned under oath and in public. Their perjury would be seen by all. Liars would be exposed.

At the end of the meeting Mr Justice Barron accompanied Ludlow family members as they visited the memorial to Seamus Ludlow in the lane off the Bog Road where the foul murder was committed in 1976.


See also the following reports of this important meeting with Mr Justice Barron:

RTE Television News, online, 23 February 2004: Barron meets relatives of man killed by UDA

The Irish News, 24 February 2004: Relatives of 1976 murder victim meet Justice Barron

The Irish Daily Star (Northern Edition), 24 February 2004: Loyalist murder report hope

I Top I

29 January 2004: See The Irish Daily Star (Northern Edition) report  Family and former British army man hit out Barron "Failed to Serve Truth" Former spy slams report for an interview with ex-British officer Fred Holroyd.

See also: The Irish Daily Star (Northern Edition): Family wants truth about murder for a Ludlow family comment on the Barron inquiry.

I Top I

10 December 2003: The long awaited publication of the private Barron Inquiry Report into the 17 May 1974 Dublin and Monaghan bombings, which caused the deaths of 33 men, women and children - plus an unborn child - and left some 240 people injured, failed to answer all the questions still being asked about this the worst single atrocity of the Troubles.

The Ludlow family, with another Barron Inquiry report into Seamus Ludlow's murder expected early in 2004, shares the Dublin and Monaghan families' disappointment in the failure of this Barron Report to bring final closure to the bereaved and injured. This failure now makes ever more pressing the families' demands for a public judicial inquiry where witnesses can be compelled to attend and give evidence under oath.

The outcome, after four years of investigation by Mr Justice Barron, and by his predecessor the late  Mr Justice Liam Hamilton, does not promote confidence in the private inquiry's forthcoming reports on the Dundalk bombing and the murder of Seamus Ludlow. These inquiries will also be hampered by missing files in the Department of Justice in Dublin and by British government indifference to requests for cooperation.

Mr Justice Barron's Report has disappointed many of the surviving victims and their relatives in that he failed to find evidence of high level collusion between the loyalist UVF murder gang and the British authorities in the Six Counties. 

Angela O'Neill, who lost her father in the attacks, said the report contained nothing that they did not already know.

"I do believe that the British State needs to be held accountable for the loss of those 33 lives... and the Irish State needs to be held accountable for their negligence in that," she said.

A solicitor representing relatives of some of the victims called for a public inquiry with powers to subpoena witnesses and documents.

"The problem is that this inquiry has been working behind closed doors for some time and simply hasn't delivered," said Des Doherty

"It's the fault of the process more than anything else - there's no other mechanism available."

He added: "How documents can go missing or cannot be found simply beggars belief."

While he did not exclude the possibility that individual RUC, UDR and British army/intelligence personnel may have been involved in a personal capacity in this outrage, Mr Justice Barron stopped short of contending that such collusion went higher. His failure to locate files in the Department of Justice - either lost or deliberately destroyed to prevent further revelations - and Britain's refusal to cooperate made such suspicions impossible to prove one way or another.

Somewhat implausibly, the Barron Report says the loyalists involved in the Dublin bombing were "capable of doing so without help" from any security forces in the North, "though this does not rule out the involvement of individual RUC, UDR or British army members".

Many, particularly in Dublin, believe the bombings were a warning shot from British intelligence for the Irish
government not to interfere in the affairs of the Six Counties.  At least three of the bombing team, all now dead, have been identified as paid British informers.

Jane Winter, the director of British Irish Rights Watch (BIRW), London, who has made detailed submissions to the Barron Inquiry, said: "Forensic evidence suggested that the bombs in Dublin were very much more sophisticated than any bombs loyalists had used before or since. All went off within one and a half minutes of each other - a technical achievement never matched before or since. The implication is that they had outside help in making these bombs."

She said if collusion were found, there would be grave consequences for Britain internationally. "Here we are gaily telling the world how to run its own human rights affairs and holding ourselves up as an example of a developed democracy which doesn't do wicked things. But if Britain did collude with loyalists to bomb another country, that is an act of war."

Mr Justice Barron concluded that the then Fine Gael/Labour coalition government led by Mr Liam Cosgrave showed "little interest" in pursuing the perpetrators of the 1974 Dublin/Monaghan bombings.

The coalition government, according to the inquiry, failed to pursue the British after the prime minister, Mr Harold Wilson, told the then Taoiseach Mr Cosgrave in November 1974 they had identified the bombers and interned them.

"Following the meetings, there is no evidence that the information was passed, either to the minister for justice, or any of his officials, or indeed the Garda commissioner." This "absence of apparent interest", said Mr Justice Barron, "strongly suggested that the government made no efforts to assist the investigation into the bombings at a political level".

Mr Justice Barron said: "It can be said that the Government of the day showed little interest in the bombings."

The Barron Inquiry Report is also heavily critical of the Garda investigation into the Dublin and Monaghan bombing attacks, which Mr Justice Henry Barron said "remain the most devastating attack on the civilian population of this State to have taken place since the Troubles began".

The investigation, which was wound down without explanation in early 1975 - some reports say it was mothballed after only 12 weeks -  "failed to make full use of the information it obtained", according to the 288-page Barron inquiry report.

Criticising the Garda, Mr Justice Barron said: "The Garda investigation failed to make full use of the information it obtained. Certain lines of inquiry that could have been pursued further in this jurisdiction were not pursued." Detectives failed to interview suspects in Northern Ireland with the RUC's co-operation, and to collect vital forensic evidence from the bombing scenes, the report says.

However, the private inquiry found no evidence to back charges that the Garda investigation into the bombings was wound down because of cabinet interference.

The allegation was sharply rejected by the former Taoiseach, Mr Cosgrave and the former minister for justice Mr Paddy Cooney during their meetings with Mr Justice Barron.

The British army, the report said, foiled "a multiple cross-Border bombing attack in March, 1974 - two months before the attacks on Dublin and Monaghan, after it infiltrated loyalist paramilitaries.

"It does not seem believable that an attack on the scale of the Dublin bombings would be allowed to go ahead simply in order to protect an informant," said Mr Justice Barron.

Mr Justice Barron criticised the lack of co-operation by the British government, which refused to make original documents available to the inquiry. 

Following a trawl of 68,000 files, the then Northern Ireland secretary of state Dr John Reid provided a 16-page document - out of  the  millions of relevant documents it held - to the inquiry in February 2002, nearly 18 months after information was sought. With some justification, the British Government was widely criticised  over its “contempt” for the Barron Inquiry 

The Ludlow family is aware that the British authorities are also failing to provide the still ongoing Barron Inquiry with documents it requested regarding the May 1976 murder of Seamus Ludlow.

Calling for a full public inquiry into the Dublin and Monaghan bombings, Greg O'Neill, the solicitor representing the Justice for the Forgotten group, said the British government must choose "whether or not it wants to be eternally suspected of being involved in supporting terrorism".

In another disturbing aspect of state obstruction  that will likely impact upon Mr Justice Barron's inquiry into the Seamus Ludlow murder and the Dundalk bombing of December 1975, a file of photographs of suspects collected by the Garda, which were shown to potential witnesses in the weeks after the bombings, "have been missing since 1993 at least".

It has been revealed that many relevant files held by the Department of Justice are missing - leading to a suspicion that they may have been shredded, thus hampering the Barron Inquiry effort at reaching the truth behind collusion in these cases. 

Speaking in Leinster House (Irish parliament), the Tanaiste Mary Harney thanked Mr Justice Barron on behalf of the Irish Government for his work on the report, and said she had no doubt its findings would be debated in the House in the New Year.

The Oireachtas committee met in private this afternoon to consider the report and it is expected to discuss its contents with its author, Justice Henry Barron.

A report into the bombings and allegations that British security services colluded with the loyalist paramilitary UVF was ordered more than three years ago by the Irish Government. No one has ever been charged in connection with the offences.

Representatives of Justice for the Forgotten, which represents about 150 survivors of the attacks and victims', met the Taoiseach in private at Government Buildings today. The group is expected to call for a full public inquiry. 

The Barron report was welcomed by Justice for the Forgotten.  Mr Greg O'Neill, solicitor for Justice for the Forgotten, said it was "an immensely important stage in the struggle of families for truth and justice".

However, three families, denouncing the Barron Report as a shambles, walked out of an earlier press conference held by the Joint Oireachtas Committee to announce the findings. Others dismissed the Report as a "re-hash of what is already in the public domain" and renewed calls for a public inquiry. 

Bernadette McNally, the chairperson of Justice for the Forgotten, said the onus was now on the Irish government to seek the full truth of the bombings. 

“It’s the responsibility of the Irish government to open every door, to force it open whatever way they can, take the responsibility for this off (Barron) and do the work they should have done 30 years ago.”

“The combination of incompetence and downright carelessness on the part of those charged with protecting the citizens of Ireland is absolutely damnable,” said Mr O’Neill.

“The time for private inquiries is over. It is no longer our burden. Damnable facts have been established, and it is now your responsibility.

“This campaign is calling on the Irish government ... to take up the responsibilities and to discharge them to the families, to the dead, to the survivors and to the people of Ireland.

“There are people who are available in this state who need to be put in the witness box and cross-examined. The time for private inquiries into these matters is over.” 

The Barron Report can be downloaded in pdf format from http://www.irlgov.ie/oireachtas/Committees-29th-Dáil/jcjedwr-debates/InterimDubMon.pdf

See also: 10.12.03 Statement by An Taoiseach Bertie Ahern TD on the publication of the Barron Report into the Dublin and Monaghan Bombings 1974

I Top I

8 November 2003: The Dundalk Democrat published three articles in which Jimmy Sharkey, a member of the Ludlow family,  reacted to the recent handing of the completed private Barron Inquiry report on the Dublin and Monaghan bombings to Taoiseach Bertie Ahern, as well as the proposed fresh inquest into the death of his uncle Seamus Ludlow, which is now expected to take place in January 2004. 

Please use the following links to read the three articles: Dundalk bombing and Ludlow murder ignored;

Family feel inquiry will make little difference;

Inquest could be next January

I Top

2 November 3003: In a Sunday Independent article,  Net is closing in on Dublin car bombers, Joe Tiernan writes about the completion of the private Barron Inquiry report on the Dublin and Monaghan bombings of May 1974. 

Referring to the many unsolved loyalist crimes south of the border, he comments: 

"48 people were killed south of the border, yet not a single individual has been convicted of any of these murders".

Ludlow family member Jimmy Sharkey was one of the interviewees featured in this article.

I Top

29 October 2003: At last, after considerable delay, the much awaited private Barron Inquiry report on the 1974 Dublin and Monaghan bombings, now completed, has been handed over to the Irish Government.

The private Barron inquiry, previously the Hamilton Inquiry, was established to investigate allegations that the British security services colluded with the loyalist paramilitaries who detonated three murderous car bombs in Dublin and one in Monaghan on May 17, 1974.

A total of 33 men, women and children died in the four car bomb blasts in Dublin and in Monaghan Town, the largest loss of life on any one day of the Troubles

Relatives of the people who died today urged the Irish government to publish without delay the findings of the Barron Inquiry. 

Mr Justice Henry Barron is also conducting separate private inquiries into the earlier Dublin bombings of 1972 and 1973 (three deaths), the bombing of Dundalk in December 1975 (two deaths) and the sectarian murder of Seamus Ludlow in May 1976. Collusion has been alleged in all of these cases too, and no prosecutions have ever resulted. These further inquiries have yet to be completed, but it is hoped that they will be concluded as quickly as possible.

The victims' families have called on Taoiseach Bertie Ahern to release the long-awaited Barron report on the 1974 Dublin/Monaghan bombings over the next two weeks.

Margaret Urwin, spokeswoman for victims' group Justice for the Forgotten, said: 

"We want it to be published without delay. We have been given no firm date at all for its publication.

"Hopefully the details will be released within a couple of weeks. We have been expecting the report for so long and are relieved that it is coming to the Government at last.

"Once the government has it, it's a big step forward.

"Now we are calling on the government to publish the findings as quickly as possible. We don't want it to be held unduly by the government."

The Barron Inquiry was due to present its report a year ago, but its investigation into the atrocity was delayed due to a lack of co-operation from the British authorities.

Despite the fact that the report has now been completed, it is not expected to be made public for several weeks.

The Irish Government is expected to examine the report in detail before deciding if its findings warrant the establishment of a public inquiry

Meanwhile, relatives of those killed and injured in the 1974 Dublin and Monaghan bombings have made clear that they want an independent inquiry.

But they have insisted that they are seeking the truth about the attacks rather than revenge against those involved

Fresh inquests recently reopened into the deaths of the 26 people who died when three car bombs exploded in central Dublin and the seven who died when another bomb exploded in the border town of Monaghan.

Both inquests were adjourned until all evidence has been gathered

I Top

12 October 2003: In an Ireland on Sunday article headlined Top names linked to Dublin-Monaghan atrocity  Bombs report names gardai 'collaborators', Frank Connolly, the newspaper's Senior Reporter, claimed that the private Barron Inquiry report into the Dublin and Monaghan bombings of 1974 will be released the next week. 

The report says nothing about the release of Mr Justice Barron's inquiry reports into the murderous Dundalk bombing of December 1975, in which two men, Jack Rooney and Hugh Watters, lost their lives, and the sectarian killing of Seamus Ludlow in May 1976. There are indications that the Barron Inquiry report into the murder of Seamus Ludlow will not be completed until sometime in 2004.  

Ireland on Sunday reports:

Senior Irish politicians and gardai will be implicated in covering up British security-force collusion over the 1974 Dublin and Monaghan bombings in a damning report to be handed to the Government this week. 

The long-awaited, and sensational Barron report, documenting British military involvement in the bombings which killed 33 people, is likely to cause a political storm when it is finally published.

'The content of the report raises deep issues concerning people who are still alive including gardai, politicians, and senior members of the British security forces,' an informed legal source told Ireland on Sunday.

The report, prepared by Mr Justice Henry Barron, is also expected to highlight a series of failures in the Garda investigation into those responsible for the attacks on May 17, 1974 - the worst single death toll in the Troubles - which included an unborn child. . . 

Use the headline link above to read the complete Ireland on Sunday article.

See also: The Sunday Independent, 2 November 3003: Net is closing in on Dublin car bombers

I Top

7 October 2003: According to a report in today's Irish News headlined Coroner still awaiting copy of murder report, the County Louth coroner Ronan Maguire, who is due to hold a new inquest into the 1976 death of Seamus Ludlow, 

has still not received a copy of an internal Garda report into the murder investigation.

Co Louth coroner Ronan Maguire yesterday (Monday) confirmed that he had requested a copy of the 1998 report compiled by Chief Superintendent Ted Murphy.

This report indicates the reluctance of the Garda to cooperate fully with the Louth Coroner's investigation, a resistance to truth that mirrors the behaviour of the RUC/PSNI and the British military in the Six Counties who have also been resisting demands by coroners for full disclosure of relevant documents in a number of cases of state killing.

For the full report, use this link.

I Top

4 September 2003 - The Ludlow family has been saddened to hear of the unexpected and sudden death of a close friend and relative.

Brendan LarkinThe family has been informed of the tragic death of Brendan Larkin (47) who passed away at his home in Dundalk, around 4.00am, 4th September. Brendan was a son of the late Barney Larkin, Dundalk, who was a step brother of the late Seamus Ludlow. Brendan leaves behind a wife Ann, children and  grandchildren, brothers and sisters.

Brendan was an active and prominent member of the Ludlow family campaign for truth and justice for Seamus Ludlow. We valued his contributions to our struggle. He had represented the Larkin family circle at all of our family meetings with the authorities on both sides of the Irish border and his tragic loss will be felt by all of us who had the honour of sharing this life and this struggle with him. We will miss him deeply.

May He Rest in Peace.

See The Argus Brendan held strong Republican ideals

I Top

16 August 2003: In the first press report for quite some time, the local Dundalk Democrat newspaper, in a brief report headed Date for Ludlow inquest, suggested that a fresh inquest into the death of murder victim Seamus Ludlow, which had been announced more than a year ago, would begin in October 2003. 

The report concluded:

County Coroner, Ronan Maguire, is continuing to go through the files on the murder but with the Baron Report due for publication in September, it is thought that the inquest may not proceed until the following month

Use the link above to read the full report.

I Top

27 June 2003: Three members of the Ludlow family, accompanied by Maura McKeever, whose late father was one of the victims of the Dundalk Bombing, 19 December 1975, travelled to Dublin where they attended the public meeting  regarding collusion that had been organized by Justice for the Forgotten.

See the Sunday Business Post article (29 June): Irish government `helped the British' during Troubles' for a report of this important meeting in Dublin.

I Top

18 June 2003: In a kind message to the Ludlow family, Margaret Urwin, of Justice for the Forgotten, Dublin, thanked the Ludlow family for their support, and announced:

a public meeting we are holding on Friday, 27 June at 8.00 pm in the Anna Livia Suite, Gresham Hotel, O'Connell St., Dublin.  The meeting is entitled 'Exposing Collusion - Britain's Role in Terrorism'.  The speakers are Colin Wallace, former Senior British Army 'Psy-Ops' Officer; Fred Holroyd, former British Army Intelligence Officer; Patricia McKenna, MEP; Paul Larkin, Author and Film Director.  In the Chair will be Paul O'Connor, Pat Finucane Centre.  We hope the Ludlow Family and friends will be able to attend this important meeting. 

The above was in reply to the Ludlow family's recent message of congratulations to Justice for the Forgotten following an announcement by the Dublin City Coroner of a fresh inquest into the deaths of the 26 victims of the three Dublin bombings of 17 May 1974, and also the death of one of the Monaghan victims  who died of injuries in a Dublin hospital.

I Top

10 March 2003: Received from Justice for the Forgotten:

Good Day,

Justice for the Forgotten represents a large number of the bereaved and survivors of the Dublin and Monaghan bombings of 17 May 1974 as well as the Dublin bombings of 1 December 1972 and 20 January 1973.

We have recently put our new website on line and would be grateful if you could add the site to the list of links on your page: http://www.seamusludlow.com/links.htm

Our web site address: http://www.dublinmonaghanbombings.org/

We would be happy to maintain a link to the the Seamus Ludlow Campaign on our website as well.

Best regards,

Patrick O'Connor (on behalf of Margaret Urwin)

Justice for the Forgotten Limited
64-66 Lower Gardiner Street
Dublin 1

Tel No: 00353-1-8554300
Fax No: 00353-1-8193258
e-mail: 1974bombings@esatlink.com


I Top

8 March 2003 - Mr Bernard Moffatt of the Celtic League made the following comments in a press release about the recent reports that the Ludlow family would have access to the gardai's original murder investigation files:

The Ludlow family are reported as having greeted the news that the files will be released with "caution". Indeed they should be cautious because it has become quite clear from the machinations down through the years to obstruct explanation and the bringing to justice the killers of Seamus Ludlow that a cover-up at the highest level has been undertaken.

Quite clearly their caution is warranted because in the present climate of peace and reconciliation there are vested interests within both the Irish and British administrations which do not wish to have too much scrutiny focused on the activities of the loyalist 'commandos', armed and supported by British Intelligence, which waged a dirty war of killings and bombings in the south of Ireland in the 1970s.

I Top

5 March 2003: See The Irish News report: 

Family's wait for murder file over


The relatives of Seamus Ludlow are for the first time to be given access to the garda file on his murder 27 years after he was gunned down by loyalists.  . .

Use the link above to read the full report.

See also: The Dundalk Democrat, 8 March 2003: Ludlow murder: files to be made available

I Top

27 February 2003: See BBC report, Troubles victims fund set up

The Dublin Government announce that a new  £2m fund for relatives of victims of the Troubles has been set up .

The money will be allocated to people in the Irish Republic.

The fund is one of the Irish Government's obligations under the 1998 Good Friday Agreement.

Among those expected to benefit are relatives of the 1974 Dublin and Monaghan bombings and the Dundalk bombing 19 December 1975 and the other victims of Loyalist murder gangs in the 26 Counties.

Read the BBC's full report of 28 February 2003.

Meanwhile, there has been another call for a public inquiry into the Dublin and Monaghan Loyalist car bombings in 1974, and another murderous explosion in Dundalk in December 1975.

The Justice For The Forgotten group, representing most of the survivors and the family's of the murdered victims of Dublin/Monaghan, says it is furious with the British Government over it's failure to co-operate in a meaningful way with the Barron Inquiry.

The Barron Commission is investigating the Dublin and Monaghan car bombs in 1974 and a December 1975 explosion in Dundalk. Mr Justice Barron is also investigating the murder of Seamus Ludlow.

Read the Irish Examiner's full report of 27 February 2003.

I Top

4 January 2003 - This photograph from the recent launch of Joe Tiernan's new book appeared in the Dundalk Democrat.

Joe Tiernan signs his book, "The Dublin and Monaghan Bombings and the Murder Triangle", for Maura McKeever, daughter of Jack Rooney, who was killed in the Dundalk bomb in Crowe Street, and Jimmy Sharkey, nephew of murdered Mountpleasant man, Seamus Ludlow.

21 December 2002 : The Dundalk Democrat reports the publication of investigative  journalist Joe Tiernan's controversial new book The Dublin-Monaghan Bombings and the Murder Triangle

The book, which has been 16 years in the writing, examines the circumstances surrounding the Dundalk, Dublin, Monaghan and Castleblaney bombings as well as the murder of Seamus Ludlow and the Reavey brothers, and many other loyalist atrocities on both sides of the border during the 1970s. 

The author identifies many of those who took part in these murderous acts, for which no one has ever been brought to justice.

Please use the link above to read the Dundalk Democrat's report.

I Top I

14 November 2002 - Members of the Ludlow family, accompanied by the family lawyer, travelled to Dublin for a further meeting with Mr Justice Henry Barron, the Irish Judge appointed by the Dublin government to conduct a private inquiry into the murder of Seamus Ludlow and the serious allegations being made by the Ludlow family. The Ludlow family had requested the meeting so that they could hear of the inquiry's progress and to enable the family to assist the respected judge by answering any questions that may arise.

In the course of a very useful meeting the Ludlow family learned that Mr Justice Barron has received practically no cooperation from the British authorities in the North of Ireland. It had been hoped that relevant RUC and British Army security files would be made available, but, disgracefully, this is not the case.

I Top I

21 September 2002 - In an article in The Dundalk Democrat, under the headline: Barron investigations lead to public inquiry into Dundalk bombing it is reported that the current Barron Inquiry into the Dundalk and Dublin/Monaghan bombings is expected to recommend a full public inquiry into it and other atrocities. The report notes:

"According to this month's edition of Magill Magazine, Justice Barron, who has been conducting an inquiry into the bombings, will not "shy away" from drawing adverse inferences from the lack of British Military co-operation received so far. . . "

Use the link above to find the Democrat's full report in our press coverage section. 

Use this link to read the article that appeared in the September 2002 edition of Magill Magazine that was the basis for the Democrat's report.

I Top I

21 September 2002 - In a statement  Mr Bernard Moffatt, Secretary General, Celtic League, comments on a disappointing reply he received from the Taoiseach's office regarding his recent letter regarding the Seamus Ludlow case. 

In Mr Moffatt's view of the failure of the Irish government to move to a public inquiry into the murder of Seamus Ludlow it is "almost as if casting a light on the darker side of these British Special Operations in Ireland was now an embarrassment to be set aside".

 Mr Moffatt concludes: "The reply is extremely disappointing. Experience tells us that selective examination of matters of this nature, however eminent the Justice involved, lack the 'cauterising' ability of a full public enquiry to unearth the truth."


Use the following link to read the full text of Mr Moffatt's statement in another Ludlow family web site. 

I Top I

23 August 2002 - The Argus (Dundalk) featured an article headlined Coroner wants the law changed to compel witnesses to attend inquests in which it is noted that the Coroners Act (1962) does not command the compulsory attendance of witnesses at inquests in Ireland. It remains to be seen whether this has implications for the proposed fresh inquest into the death of Seamus Ludlow. 

Use the link above to read the Argus report in our press coverage section in another Ludlow family website.

I Top I

28 July 2002 - Mr Bernard Moffatt, Secretary General of the Celtic League organization, a valued supporter of the Ludlow family's demands for truth and justice, reports on the Celtic League's Annual General Meeting, which was held over the weekend. The AGM discussed recent developments in the Ludlow campaign and a statement was issued.

The Celtic League renewed its support by passing the following resolution:

"This AGM: Whilst welcoming the decision of Attorney General, Rory Brady, to instruct the Coroner for County Louth, Mr. Ronan Maguire BL, to hold an inquest into the death of Seamus Ludlow, the Celtic League reiterates its support for the Ludlow families request for a full and independent public enquiry."

See Mr Moffatt's full statement elsewhere on another Ludlow family website.

I Top I

20 July 2002 - Local LMFM Radio again reported on the recently announced fresh inquest for the murdered Seamus Ludlow:

LUDLOW FAMILY WANT SEPARATE INVESTIGATIONS

THE FAMILY OF THE NORTH LOUTH MAN MURDERED BY LOYALISTS 26 YEARS AGO SAY THEY WANT THE NEW INQUEST INTO HIS DEATH TO BE KEPT SEPARATE FROM THE INQUIRY INTO HIS KILLING. EARLIER THIS WEEK THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RORY BRADY CONFIRMED HE HAS INSTRUCTED THE LOUTH COUNTY CORONER RONAN MAGUIRE TO CARRY OUT A FRESH INQUIRY INTO THE DEATH OF SEAMUS LUDLOW.

I Top I

20 July 2002 - Ludlow family member Jimmy Sharkey comments on the proposed fresh inquest in this week's edition of the Dundalk Democrat:

Although it is not known yet when the inquest will open, Jimmy said his family did not mind a few months wait, after twenty-six years, to ensure that it will be fully prepared.

"Two of the three bullets used in Seamus' murder were sent to Northern Ireland for forensic examination and up until last March hadn't been traced. One bullet may still be in the South, though its not certain. These bullets are going to have to be traced.

"Also, the authorities never returned Seamus' clothes and so they should still be in storage somewhere".

In the meantime, the family are continuing to be involved with the Inquiry being carried out by Justice Henry Barron. But they insist that both the inquest and inquiry will be dealt with as two different issues.

As Jimmy explained: "it's twenty-six years since Seamus was murdered. Anything that comes along now can only help us. We see the inquest as yet another step, but we don't want a half-hearted effort. we want a fully-prepared inquest with all the information presented, including forensics and ballistics".

I Top I

19 July 2002 - See reports of the new development in The Irish News and The Irish Independent.

I Top I

18 July 2002 - In  an early morning radio interview on local LMFM, in which he spoke about the expected fresh inquest into the death of his uncle Seamus Ludlow, Jimmy Sharkey also spoke of the Ludlow family's demand for a public inquiry.

LMFM reported the latest development in the Ludlow family's campaign for justice on its website as follows:

INQUEST NOT EXPECTED UNTIL 2003

THE FAMILY OF THE NORTH LOUTH MAN MURDERED BY LOYALISTS 26 YEARS AGO SAY THEY DON’T EXPECT A NEW INQUEST INTO HIS DEATH TO BE HELD UNTIL EARLY NEXT YEAR. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL RORY BRADY HAS CONFIRMED THAT HE HAS ORDERED LOUTH COUNTY CORONER RONAN MAGUIRE TO OPEN A FRESH INQUEST INTO THE DEATH OF SEAMUS LUDLOW.

I Top I

3 July 2002 - In an important new development for the Ludlow family, the office of the Irish Attorney General Rory Brady wrote to the family solicitor regarding the holding of a fresh inquest into the death of Seamus Ludlow.

The family's lawyer had written on 30 May 2002 requesting of the AG that he exercise his powers under section 24(1) of the Coroners Act, 1962 and direct the holding of a fresh inquest into the death of Seamus Ludlow.

The AG's representative wrote: 

I am now pleased to inform you that the Attorney General has acceded to that request, which you have made on behalf of the relatives of Mr Ludlow.

The Attorney has, by a recent letter, directed the Coroner for County Louth, Mr Ronan Maguire BL to hold an inquest into the death of Seamus Ludlow.

As yet no further details as to the date of this new inquest are available. 

I Top I

27  June 2002 - Members of the Ludlow family travelled to Dublin for the first of a series of meetings with Mr Justice Henry Barron, who is conducting a private inquiry into the Seamus Ludlow murder on behalf of the Dublin government.

I Top I

14 June 2002 - Jane Winter, Director, British Irish Rights Watch (BIRW), London, has  just updated BIRW's independent Report on the Death of Seamus Ludlow. The influential Report was published originally in February 1999. 

A copy of the new BIRW Report, along with the documentary evidence on which it relies,  has been sent  to Mr Justice Henry Barron, the Irish judge who leads an Independent Commission of Inquiry into the Dublin, Monaghan and Dundalk Bombings as well as the murder of Seamus Ludlow. 

I Top I

30 May 2002 - The lawyer acting on behalf of the Ludlow family has made submissions to the Irish Attorney-General regarding a new inquest in relation to the case of  Seamus Ludlow. It will be remembered that the original inquest of 19 August 1976 was unsatisfactory in that it went ahead without any members of the Ludlow family or their legal advisers being informed in time to be present and because there was no examination of the forensic and ballistics evidence which might have helped clarify important questions which remained unanswered.

The Ludlow family feel that a new inquest could help rectify many faults that were apparent in the original, as well as take advantage of the new information that has come to light in recent times. See above: 3 July 2002 for further details.

15 May 2002 - See reports from today's Dundalk Argus  for Sinn Fein candidate Arthur Morgan's response to the Oliver family and further comment on the Oliver family's letter regarding the death of the late Tom Oliver.

I Top I

11 May 2002 - See  Mark Hennessy's article from  the Irish Times, regarding another family's letter to Arthur Morgan, a Sinn Fein candidate in the Irish general election campaign in County Louth. According to Mr Hennessy, this  letter was written three  weeks ago. 

However, it is only now being used in an apparent attempt to affect a particular candidate's vote in the election and the Ludlow family campaign has been dragged into the debate.

I Top I

10 May 2002 -  The Ludlow family was surprised and saddened to read reports in today's Dundalk Argus and The Times of London which threaten to drag this campaign into an arena not of their choosing. 

The reports could undermine the credibility and integrity of the strictly non-political nature of the Ludlow family's campaign for justice - a campaign organised by the Ludlow family alone and directed by no political party or grouping in the political arena.

 The Ludlow family has not sought to identify the campaign with any one political party or individual in the political arena and any attempt to use the tragic murder of Seamus Ludlow as a political football to score points off certain individuals in the present Irish general election contest will be fervently resisted.

Though the late Seamus Ludlow has not been insulted by today's press reports, the Ludlow family is appalled by the manner in which his name has been used by others on this sad occasion. 

The Ludlow family requests that the good name of Seamus Ludlow and his family's grief are shown the same respect that this family accords to all other victims and their families.

Use the links above to view today's reports.

I Top I

17 April 2002 - It was claimed today that the British authorities have provided  Irish judge Mr Justice Henry Barron, investigating, privately,  the 1974 Dublin and Monaghan bombings, with an ''enormous amount'' of information. 

Taoiseach Bertie Ahern said the judge had received an ''enormous amount'' of files and information. 

The details should allow Mr Justice Barron to provide an interim report by the autumn into the 1974 attacks which killed 33 men and women, Mr Ahern said.

Bereaved families and victims of the attacks have been lobbying for months for Britain to hand over security documents to the inquiry.

They accused Britain of stalling on co-operation, fuelling their suspicion that British security services colluded with loyalist bombers to plant the devices on May 17, 1974.


But during Taoiseach`s Question Time in Leinster House today, Mr Ahern said a large quantity of documents had now been handed over which would allow Justice Barron to produce an interim report.

However, he added, a preliminary trawl of the documents by the judge suggested that more papers were still needed.

Mr Ahern told the House: "On the issue of Justice Barron I understand he did receive an enormous amount of information, data and files. Whether that will resolve a lot of issues I do not know.


"Certainly he has received the information he asked for and a lot of the records and from that he has highlighted areas where there are gaps and where he wants further information.

"But he is receiving co-operation and there are direct lines of assistance there that were not there.

"That has allowed him to move on very quickly and very speedily to bring us his interim report on the other side of summer," he said.


I Top I

11 April 2002 - The Irish Minister for Justice, John O'Donoghue TD,  responded to a Supreme Court judgment in the Abbeylara Case that may, or may not have a bearing on the State's proposal for a Joint Oireachtas Committee investigation into the murder of Seamus Ludlow, following the completion of a private inquiry by Mr Justice Barron.

The Minister has said that he is going to recommend the establishment of a Tribunal of Enquiry into the circumstances surrounding the killing, by an armed Gardai unit, of John Carthy at Abbeylara, County Longford, 2 years ago.

Speaking at the Garda College in Templemore, Mr O'Donoghue said he would recommend the establishment of the tribunal under a High Court judge at the earliest opportunity.

His remarks follow this morning's Irish Supreme Court judgment that the inquiry by an Oireachtas sub-committee could not be resumed. The court upheld an earlier ruling made regarding such inquiries by the High Court, but limited it to this particular case.

The Court decided by a majority of five to two that the Oireachtas could not conduct an inquiry which could result in findings of fact and conclusions adverse to the good name and reputation of those who are not members of parliament.

This includes a finding of unlawful killing against such a person. Mrs Justice Susan Denham said there was no power in the constitution for inquiries of this type.

However, both Mrs Justice Denham and her colleagues considered the High Court decision too wide. It had encompassed all such committee inquiries.

The court has limited its decision to this inquiry. Mr Justice Hardiman said it was impossible to anticipate what issues might arise under legislation which did not exist.

Given that any inquiry into the 1976 murder of Seamus Ludlow will also entail close examination of the Gardai's handling of the murder investigation, their lying to the Ludlow family about IRA involvement and their withholding of important evidence pointing to the guilt of known Loyalists, it remains to be seen if the Abbeylara judgment will impinge upon any inquiry into the Ludlow inquiry.

    I Top I

9 March 2002 - See interview with Ludlow family member Jimmy Sharkey in The Dundalk Democrat where he talks at length about the meeting with the police ombudsman in Belfast.

I Top I

4 March 2002 - In a further development, members of the Ludlow family, accompanied by a representative of MacGuill and Company, solicitors, Dundalk, and Jane Winter, Director, British Irish Rights Watch, London, met with Mrs Nuala O'Loan, Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland, and two senior members of her investigations team, in Belfast. Once again, Jane Winter flew over from London that morning especially to support the Ludlow family.

The police ombudsman had written to the family's legal representative on 3 January 2002, stating that she had "detailed files" on the investigation insofar as it was carried out by the RUC.

The meeting followed approaches from the Ludlow family's legal representative, who requested that the ombudsman investigate the RUC's conduct of the original murder investigation and other relevant issues (see link below to the Sunday Tribune report of 15 April 2001).

Unfortunately, very little new information emerged from the meeting with Mrs O'Loan, who reported that their investigation left them with more questions than answers regarding the failure to arrest the four prime suspects in February 1979.

No fault was found with the RUC's handling of the case, though there were apparent gaps in the file that failed to explain why certain action was not taken at particular times. The ombudsman particularly questioned the role of the gardai in failing to act on the information that was provided by the RUC on 15 February 1979!

Some points did emerged which demand further explanation by both forces:

  • The ombudsman revealed that the RUC first acquired information on the four suspects for Seamus Ludlow's murder, from an unspecified intelligence source, as early as September 1977 - more than a year before this information was passed on to the gardai! No explanation could be found for the RUC's failure to pass the information to the gardai in 1977. The Ludlow family found this revelation to be very disturbing.

  • The ombudsman could not say if any action was taken by the RUC at that time - whether the suspects were ever arrested, questioned or placed under surveillance - or at any time afterwards. This possible inaction was not criticised by the ombudsman's team, because it was not regarded as "their murder" - it was for the gardai to take whatever action was appropriate and it was not their fault that the gardai failed to request assistance in making arrests. Not "their murder" maybe, but certainly their killers since two of them  were serving soldiers of the Crown.

  • No new information was available at the time of the four suspects' arrest by the RUC on 17 February 1998. Their arrest was entirely based on information that was available in February 1979 - if, indeed, not September 1977. Of course, if this intelligence was so strong as to justify four arrests in 1998, we can then justly wonder why they were not arrested in 1979 or before!

None of the above inspires confidence in the role of the RUC in this sad affair.

See also: The Sunday Tribune, 15 April 2001: O'Loan asked to investigate Ludlow killing

I Top I

2 March 2002 - The local Dundalk Democrat newspaper published an interview with Jimmy Sharkey, a nephew of Seamus Ludlow,  in which he explains the implications of the Dublin government's 21 February refusal to grant a public inquiry. Jimmy gives the Ludlow family's first public reaction to this setback for the campaign for truth and justice for Seamus Ludlow.

I Top I

28 February 2002 - In her Director's Report for February 2002, Jane Winter, British Irish Rights Watch, made the following comments about her recent visit to Dublin to accompany the Ludlow family at their meeting with the Attorney General:

On 21st February I travelled to Dublin to meet the Irish Attorney General together with the family of Seamus Ludlow, who was murdered in1976, allegedly by northern paramilitaries, some of whom were serving soldiers.  His family are calling for a public inquiry, but the Irish government insists that all that is on offer is a private commission of inquiry similar to that currently looking at the 1974 Dublin and Monaghan bombings.  The problem with that is that the family will not be able to scrutinise the evidence or submissions of police officers and others who have lied about the murder in the past.  It is a matter of great regret that the Irish government, who have been ready to support the calls for public inquiries into murders in Northern Ireland, such as those of Patrick Finucane, Rosemary Nelson and Robert Hamill, is so reluctant to apply the same standards to a murder of one of its own citizens.

See also: Jane Winter cited in The Irish News, 23 February 2002: 'Public inquiry needed'

I Top

21 February 2002 - The Ludlow family has been informed that the Dublin Government has decided to disregard their demands for a public inquiry into the murder of Seamus Ludlow and will go ahead with a private inquiry under Mr Justice Henry Barron. 

This information was conveyed personally by Mr Michael McDowell, the Attorney General. The Ludlow family has been given a draft terms of reference for such a private inquiry, similar to that for the ongoing private Barron inquiries into the Dublin/Monaghan and Dundalk bombings.

Mr McDowell  has been reassured that the Ludlow family's position regarding the private Barron Inquiry has not altered since their previous unsatisfactory meeting with Mr John O'Donoghue, the Minister for Justice. 

Mr McDowell, representing the Government, wanted the Ludlow family to accept this proposal with the understanding that they could ultimately reject its findings and renew their demand for a public inquiry.

Mr McDowell argued that a lot has now changed since the British and Irish Governments signed their Weston Park Agreement, though he did not elaborate in any great detail exactly what had been agreed. He confirmed that No Public Inquiry will be held by the Government in advance of the Barron private inquiry and he hoped that the Ludlow family could be persuaded to give their approval, though the private inquiry would go ahead anyway without it.

The meeting at the AG's Office, Government Buildings, Dublin, was altogether a different affair from the cold meeting with the Justice Minister in 2001. Mr McDowell was firm, though also  courteous, and friendly towards the Ludlow family, and he displayed  the kind of intimate knowledge of the issues involved that was clearly lacking with Mr O'Donoghue.

Once again the Ludlow family delegation was accompanied by their esteemed legal representative James MacGuill, solicitor, Dundalk, and by Jane Winter, Director of British Irish Rights Watch, London, who had kindly flown over especially for the meeting and caught a return flight later that evening.

The Ludlow family and their representatives were very disappointed that Mr McDowell had called them together to hear nothing new, just a restatement of proposals that were rejected in 2001. It had been hoped that in the intervening months  the authorities would have thought again about their unacceptable proposals.

Mr McDowell was politely asked to convey to the Government the Ludlow family's request that they think again about going ahead with the private inquiry as envisaged. The Ludlow family put forward their own proposals that, it was hoped, , might result in a more acceptable conclusion all round.

The Ludlow family firmly restated their rejection of the private nature of the Baron Inquiry, and in no way was critical of the integrity of Mr Justice Barron. The still unresolved outcome of the Abbeylara Case, and the apparent undermining of the proposed Joint Oireachtas Committee process - the only "public" part of the Government's proposal - did nothing to recommend the process to the Ludlow family.

Furthermore, given the high degree of corruption that is all too obvious within the Gardai today - with a public inquiry recently announced to look into Gardai abuses against the McBreartry family and other incidents in Donegal - there could be no confidence in the Gardai's giving full disclosure of relevant files, documents and truthful answers to Mr Justice Barron.

The Ludlow family has been lied to by elements within the Gardai for nearly 26 years now and there can be little faith in such liars now coming clean in private sessions with Mr Justice Barron. 

See also the Dundalk Democrat of 2 March 2002 for further information; and The Irish News, 23 February 2002: 'Public inquiry needed'.

I Top I

17 January 2002 - Writing to Ludlow family member Jimmy Sharkey - in reply to a letter dated 12 December 2001 - Mr. Gerry Adams MP (Sinn Fein) said:

I and Sinn Fein are fully in support of your family's campaign into the circumstances of the murder of your Uncle Seamus Ludlow.

I spoke to the Taoiseach about this when I met with him a week ago. I also gave him a copy of your letter and he assured me he would respond.

I will keep in touch.

I Top I

3 January 2002 - The Police Ombudsman for Northern Ireland, Mrs Nuala O'Loan, responded to the Ludlow family's request for an investigation into the RUC's handling of the Seamus Ludlow case by writing the following letter to the Ludlow family's Dundalk solicitor:

Dear Sirs

Re: Seamus Ludlow deceased

I write further to my letter of 6 November 2001. We have detailed files in relation to the investigation, insofar as it was carried out in Northern Ireland by the RUC. The situation is compounded by the cross border difficulties of the Garda investigation, over which I have absolutely no jurisdiction. We are, however, considering the entire contents of the file including the investigation which was carried out more recently by the Royal Ulster Constabulary. I would hope to be in a position to respond to you by the end of this month with something definitive in relation to Mr Ludlow's case.

I apologise for the delay in dealing with this matter.

Yours sincerely

NUALA O'LOAN (Mrs)
POLICE OMBUDSMAN FOR NORTHERN IRELAND
See also: Ludlow family's meeting with Mrs O'Loan on 4 March 2002
See also: The Sunday Tribune, 15 April 2001: O'Loan asked to investigate Ludlow killing

I Top I

2 December 2001 - Belfast journalist Ed Moloney referred briefly to the Ludlow family's refusal to accept the private Barron inquiry into the murder of Seamus Ludlow on the grounds of its inadequacy, in his article  "Long List of those who want no Finucane Inquiry", that featured in the Dublin Sunday Tribune newspaper.

The Sunday Tribune report begins:

Amid the calls for a public inquiry into the 1989 assassination of Belfast lawyer Pat Finucane last week few people noticed that the mechanism chosen to deal with the scandal - the appointment of a judge to decide whether to hold a public inquiry - is a device that British prime minister Tony Blair can thank Taoiseach Bertie Ahern for suggesting and the officials in the Republic’s Department of Justice for dreaming up.

The same strategem is being used in the Republic to deal with two festering controversies both of which feature allegations of dirty tricks by British intelligence south of the Border. One is the 1974 bombing of Dublin and Monaghan by Loyalists and the other the 1976 murder of Dundalk man, Seamus Ludlow whose killing by Loyalists is alleged to have been covered up by an unholy alliance of British intelligence and the Garda Special Branch.

A High Court judge, Mr Justice Barron has been appointed to investigate both incidents and must report to the Oireachtas whose members will decide whether a public inquiry should be held. But the ploy has failed to satisfy all the relatives of the victims, whose campaign obliged Taoiseach Bertie Ahern to take the action.

Members of Seamus Ludlow’s family are having nothing to do with the investigation on the grounds of its inadequacy while relatives of the dead of Dublin and Monaghan are said to be increasingly frustrated by the refusal of the British authorities to furnish vital documents to Mr Justice Barron. . .

Please use the link above to access Ed Moloney's full report on the Newshound website.

I Top I

29 November 2001 - The Irish Justice Minister Mr. John O'Donoghue TD gave the following Written Answer to a Dail Question (No. 143) submitted by Mr. Seamus Kirk TD (Louth). Mr. Kirk had asked the Minister if he would consider establishing a commission similar to the Truth and Reconciliation Commission in South Africa, to deal with the murder of Seamus Ludlow. 

Unfortunately, the Minister's statement takes this serious matter no further, with little evidence of any movement at all in Mr. O'Donoghue's thinking regarding a public inquiry. Mr. O'Donoghue replied:

The position in this matter remains as outlined in my reply to Parliamentary Question No. 297 on 19th June, 2001.

The Government decided in principle in September 1999 to establish an inquiry into this case as well as the bombings in Dublin/Monaghan and Dundalk. This proposed inquiry - which would be carried out on the same basis as the present inquiry into the Dublin/Monaghan bombings - has not found favour with the relatives of the victim or their legal representatives. In the circumstances, it has not so far been possible to progress the matter further. I am however keeping the matter under close review, and I very much hope that the Government will be in a position to proceed with the proposed inquiry as soon as possible.

I Top I

28 November 2001 - The following letter appeared in the Irish News. It was sent in response to reports that the British authorities had decided to appoint an international judge to head a private inquiry into the February 1989 murder of the eminent Belfast solicitor Pat Finucane and a number of other selected cases. 

The appointment was made following the dramatic collapse of the trial of the loyalist ex-UDA quarter master and RUC Special Branch agent William Stobie (51) in Belfast following the withdrawal of a vital witness. The proposed private inquiry would begin not later than April 2002.

The letter, from a member of the Ludlow family, who fully supports the demands of the Finucane, Nelson and Hanna families  for full public inquiries into the murders of their loved ones, sought to place on record the demands of other families whose loved ones' murders have been excluded from this private judicial inquiry.

The letter to the Irish News is not a definitive opinion on the proposed private inquiry, which only the Finucane family can give. The Finucane family's opinion came quickly in a press release. The inquiry was seen as "another delaying tactic".

 

The Ludlow family member's letter reads as follows:

Dear Editor

I have read with interest your report (27 November) of the British  decision to appoint a judge to investigate further allegations of collusion in the murder of solicitor Pat Finucane and others. Your report states:

"The judge would investigate allegations of collusion in the murders of Mr Finucane, Robert Hamill, Rosemary Nelson, Chief Superintendent Harry Breen and Superintendent Bob Buchanan, Lord Justice and Lady Gibson and LVF leader Billy Wright. And would have power to recommend public inquiries where necessary."

There should of course be a full public inquiry into the murder of Mr. Finucane.

While I do not automatically endorse or trust this latest British development, given the well-trodden path of previous flawed investigations, I do wish to address a few brief points to the British authorities. Why stop with the above mentioned cases? 

Why not investigate the obvious collusion involved in the murder of my late uncle Seamus Ludlow, who was killed by UDR and Red Hand Commando personnel inside County Louth on 2 May 1976? Why not also investigate the foul murders of Jack Rooney and Hugh Watters, the victims of the Dundalk bombing of 19 December 1975? 

Further, why not fully cooperate with the ongoing Dublin private Barron Inquiry into the infamous Dublin and Monaghan bombings by finally handing over the long requested security files and documentation that was requested by Mr. Justice Barron several months ago? There is certainly ample reason for investigation of the collusion involved in all these cases and more.

The Ludlow family, blighted by state indifference, on both sides of the border, to the loss of their loved one at the hands of British agents, of course renews its demand for a public judicial inquiry, into both the murder of Seamus Ludlow and the long cover-up and smear campaign that followed, but there seems little evidence here to suggest that Britain has changed its disdainful attitude to the relatives of the victims of its state murder gangs in Ireland.

Yours sincerely,

Michael Donegan.

Top I

27 November 2001 - It is reported that the Dublin government plans to appeal against the Dublin high Court's decision to uphold the Gardai's challenge against the Joint Oireachtas Committee's power to hold an  investigation into the shooting dead of John Carthy, of Abbeylara, in County Longford, in April 2000. It is further reported that Mr. O'Donoghue, Minister for Justice, intends to hold a public inquiry into this controversial incident if the government's appeal fails.

Since Mr. O'Donoghue (at a meeting with him on 23 May 2001) has sought to persuade the Ludlow family to accept the private Barron Inquiry as the best means of investigating the murder of Seamus Ludlow, with his final report eventually being examined before an open hearing of a Joint Oireachtas Committee, the Ludlow family is firmly of the opinion that the minister must now proceed with a full public inquiry on the same basis as the one he apparently has in mind for the Abbeylara inquiry.

I Top I

23 November 2001 - In a devastating blow to the Dublin government's proposed plan for a private inquiry and Joint Oireachtas Committee investigation into the 1976 murder of Seamus Ludlow, the three-judge Irish High Court in Dublin, in a landmark decision, has sharply  restricted the scope of Oireachtas investigations. 

The Court has upheld a challenge by 36 members of the armed Garda Emergency Response Unit against the conduct of the inquiry into the April 2000 killing of John Carthy in Abbeylara, County Longford. Oireachtas inquiries cannot now make "findings of fact or expressions of opinion" which damage the good name of citizens who are not TDs or senators. 

Thus the gardai responsible for the death of John Carthy remain unaccountable and those gardai who were responsible for covering up the true facts behind the murder of Seamus Ludlow, and protecting his loyalist/UDR killers, are likewise protected from answering questions before a Joint Oireachtas Committee hearing.

This development now makes it imperative that the Dublin government should immediately call into being a public inquiry into the murder of Seamus Ludlow. The Ludlow family can have no faith in a private inquiry process - with or without the now effectively neutered Joint Oireachtas Committee hearing that has been promoted by Mr. John O'Donoghue TD, the Minister for Justice.