URL this page at http://freespace.virgin.net/nick.child/famsyscamhs.htm or through <www.forallthat.com> and its <Complete Index> Feedback to nick.child@virgin.net

A FAMILY-SYSTEMS APPROACH TO CAMHS PUT SIMPLY

 

In 1991, the BBC (Radio 4) visited us to add a programme on Family Therapy to their series on psychotherapies in "All In The Mind" (I think it was called). To prepare Janice Galloway, the interviewer, we wanted to summarise simply our family-systems approach to a child and adolescent mental health service (CAMHS). The Motherwell team then was three of us: Anne Hood (social worker then), Rachel Morley (clinical psychologist) and Nick Child (child and family psychiatrist).

MAIN POINTS

1. From the start, we consider who's involved in the presenting picture?
"The people involved" are the "system" concerned. Often and in the first place this is just the immediate family - characteristically, a "Family Therapist" might always make this assumption. The invitation to an appointment is then to "all those living at home" because it "helps to get a full picture and plan for the best".

Often the individuals in the family are already working hard at solving something. If no one's bothered, the presenting problem is likely to be a protest of cry for help, in itself drawing in someone else or raising the level of concern; and/or the problem may be a solution for the sadness [e.g stealing, overdose, alcohol].

2. At the appointment, we consider who we may need to work with next time?
Perhaps the father has not come - or the granny or a helper from another agency - but they are obviously important and we need to explore involving them. Or we can suggest seeing just the [parent[s] next time - if only because the young children were so noisy they were distracting from sorting something out, as they may well be doing at home too!

3. We find that the combination of individuals' solutions may be what's keeping the problem going.
This "circle" of solutions and problems is another part of what we mean by a "system". An example: 8 year old Donna feels neglected and sad; Donna gets grumpy and misbehaves; Dad sees Donna as needing understanding; Mum thinks she's playing it up, both sure they're right [as they both may be]; the softer Dad gets, the harder Mum gets to balance things and vice versa; Mum and Dad fall out with each other; Mum and Dad feel defeated and resentful; they don't have time for Donna; so ...... Donna feels neglected and sad and so on. Of course, there may be a whole complicated story behind this which may need exploring before things can change.

4. They're supposed to be weak, but clients usually have great strengths.
Individuals and families usually have good reasons for what they're doing. Great strength and even heroism will be found in those who have often had to face grave challenges in their lives.

5. Seeing the family together allows us and them to see what could change soon
Meeting together allows a full picture to actually happen "here and now". We also see when and where it isn't happening, showing the family's strengths. The family and the worker open up ideas and options [e.g deciding loyalties, needing to talk to each other before dealing with the children, or sharing different upbringings, feelings or secrets]. Perhaps plans will emerge for meaningful things to do as homework between sessions.

6. This whole process can be very complex, so live team help is needed for the worker
Live team work is of positive use in many ways as it frees and supports the worker. It helps pick up or "mirror" what's happening and focus it most helpfully for the family. Taking a break for a team consultation [while the family have theirs!] makes one interview worth more than two as a live creative process takes shape. It seems appropriate to have one "system" [the team] to work with another [the family etc.]

7. Other helping agencies are often involved so we work hard at liaising with them.
Another aspect of a "systems" approach is that, over particular cases or in general, the agencies in a district need to work together to form a broad "team".

8. This approach may be intensive but often brief
Even one or two family meetings may be enough, but 4-8 would be average, and occasionally longer is needed. Sessions are usually several weeks apart.

 

OTHER QUESTIONS

Why meet a family all together?
This gives a vivid full picture. It values and include's everyone's contributions and ideas equally. If they're not included, then they may not be able to support change. You can avoid suggestions that someone has already tried. It's much quicker, and it's fun!

Won't seeing them together inhibit important secrets from being told?
The most striking demonstration that a family has an important secret is in a family interview, where the worker can comment openly for all and explore the problematic effects of having a secret, without needing to know what it is at first. Seeing an individual and discovering the secret secretly may only add to the problem of what you and the individual do next. However, sometimes it is necessary to arrange to see an individual, for example, in suspected child sexual abuse.

What kind of problems get referred?
This kind of agency gets referred children aged 0-16 plus [and their families. Presenting problems include the following : Worrying feelings [sad, phobias, nightmares], behaviour in or out of the home [aggression, not doing what they're told, stealing, lying, running away], school difficulties [truancy or not attending, poor work] medical things [physical symptoms with or without physical causes, diet, soiling, wetting, attempted suicide], and open family conflict [around divorce, fostering and adoption,family violence and sexual abuse, and child care questions]. We also offer consultation to other agencies work with children and families.

Why don't you call what you do "Family Therapy"
We are not set up as a "Family Therapy" service. Families do not come here saying "We have a family problem; give us a Family Therapy", they usually say "We're worried that our child has a problem". A "systems approach" needs to go wider [and narrower] than just "the family", especially since there are many varied forms of family in our modern society. The word "therapy" is too mystifying, unclear and medical for our liking. We [and the local culture] prefer to call a spade a spade. So, if we have to call it anything, we call ours a "Family Systems Approach" within which we may have to consider all kinds of ways of helping, one of which may be "family work". However, Family Therapists might call most of what we do Family Therapy.

August 1991

 

All feedback is welcome to:

nick.child@virgin.net

Click these to return to index pages:

Demystification Index . . . . Systemic Practice Index . . . . Nick's Work Index . . . . CFC Index . . . . Nick Child's Play

or to the: Forallthat Homepage . . . . The Complete Index

 

URL this page at http://freespace.virgin.net/nick.child/famsyscamhs.htm or through <www.forallthat.com> and its <Complete Index> Feedback to nick.child@virgin.net