For any formal meeting, especially non-client ones, rate the categories below:

DATE: . . . . . . . . . PLACE MEETING HELD: . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

MEETING (brief description to typify if not identify it and the participants): . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

OVERALL AIMS: 1. Were the aims clear? (Scale 0 to 4, 0 = totally unclear, 4= totally clear) ....
2. Were aims achieved? (Scale 0 to 4, 0 = totally not, 4 = totally achieved) ...................................

ORGANISATION: (Scale 0 to 4, roughly 0.5 point each for eight items achieved alright:
1. Right membership? 2. Notification?
3. Preparation? 4. Best location? 5. Chairing/timing? 6. Notes/minute-taking? 7. If cut short, was this reasonably done with damage awareness? 8. Good fit with day's diary?) .....................................

FOLLOW THROUGH: (Scale 0 to 4, roughly 1 point each for 4 items:
At the meeting, were issues, decisions and consequences
1. attempted to be identified and planned for follow through?
2. clearly been identified and planned for follow through?
3. been followed through since the meeting?
4. been resolved since the meeting?
(for 3 and 4, if too soon to tell, are you confident they will be?) ..........................................................

BY WHOSE EFFORTS? Is this description the result of your efforts or other people's efforts - ie it may be brilliant because someone else made it so; or it may be awful despite your massive efforts.
(Scale -3 to+3, -3 = you were a lazy b, +3 = all your own efforts) .......................................................

AUDITED? Has the meeting been audited recently? (Scale 0 or 1, No or Yes)

TOTAL: (SCALE: 0 = Mince; 20 = Alive and Kicking)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
For later meta- or management interpretation: Was this meeting essential for: 1. CFC work
2. Worker as individual (eg training experience) 3. External cause with CFC benefit (eg AFT)
(Mark X = Not really essential; 0 = So so; E = Essential)

Feedback to: CFC, 49 Airbles Road, MOTHERWELL ML1 2TJ & to:

nick.child@virgin.net