Adrian Utley
IRC chat 1
Interview 1
Beth Gibbons
Interview 1
Interview 2
Interview 3
Dave Mc Donnald
None found as yet!
Geoff Barrow
Interview 1
Interview 2
Interview 3
Interview 4
Interview 5
Others
Interview with Adrian, Geoff and Dave
|
For Portishead it's always sour times
Three years ago Portishead hit with "Sour Times," and trip-hop was born. Now they've returned to the scene of the crime with a new album. ATN editor Michael Goldberg grills band mastermind Geoff Barrow.
By Michael
Goldberg
A note played on a keyboard repeats. It's followed by additional
notes, some repeating, echoing. The mood is eerie, haunted. Something
strange is going on. It's almost like the audio equivalent of
the opening to the old "The Twilight Zone" TV series.
Then a twangy chord, the entrance of singer Beth Gibbons, her
voice harsh, edgy, lifted off a 78, and the trip has begun. "But
don't despair, this day will be the damnedest day, oh, if you,
take these things from me," she sings.
The second Portishead album is an epic work. More than two years
in the making, it picks up where Dummy, the groups hit
debut, left off. It is a dark, despairing album. It is also a
mesmerizing work of beauty, and impossible to resist.
Portishead emerged in 1994 with "Sour Times," the heartbreaking
ballad with the James Bond guitar riff and the trip-hop beat.
While is was "Sour Times," that hooked us, when we got our hands
on the album, we weren't disappointed. Dummy was a revelation,
at once introducing master studio wizards -- co- producer and
beatmaster Geoff Barrow, guitarist Adrian Utley and musician/engineer
Dave McDonald -- and a striking singer/lyricist, Beth Gibbons.
Addicted To Noise editor Michael spoke with Barrow about the
group's new album, and their mysterious singer. "For me, it was
that [I wanted it to] be a real record," Barrow said of Portishead.
"A real album that starts and it takes you somewhere."
Addicted To Noise: Well, first of all, I wanted to ask you
about how you view recording and making records. Because it seems
like you are really trying to push boundaries. Even the way you
look at making records is very different than a lot of people.
Geoff Barrow: It is. I suppose it is really. The way
that we do it just seems natural to us. There's never any boundaries
of recording. There's nothing you can't do. To achieve a sound
on a beat or on a vocal or on a guitar or whatever, there's nothing
that is wrong to achieve that sound, you know what I mean, in
the sense of technique to make it sound like that. The restrictions
of recording techniques during the 1980s was so huge with so-called
professionalism. You have to record a drum kit with like 30 microphones,
you know what I mean? It had to be done in a room that sounded
a certain way. We still go along in the sense of a room that sounds
good. But in the '80s it was so limited and so technology inspired
that everything had to be cleaner, everything had to be tighter.
It kind of squashed a lot of the emotion and mistakes and all
kinds of things that go to make good music out of the music. It
was just a weird state.
We just record in loads of different ways. We put stuff on tape.
We put beats to vinyl, then we sample them. We stick things through
little amps and re-record them again. Usually, the crappier the
machine, the better it sounds. It's the way that we work. It's
weird because we've got Dave [musician/engineer Dave McDonald],
who's done years of recording and engineering and co-production
and we've got Adrian {Portishead guitarist and studio ace Adrian
Utley], who's very, very purist about sound in the sense because
he played jazz for over 20 years and loved the original jazz recordings.
[Producer] Rudy Van Gelder and people like that. The sound of
Blue Note [Records].
And for me, I've always been into hip-hop, which is the other
side of things. But we're all inspired by old records, old vinyl.
And we love the sound of old vinyl. And so when we sample something
or when we even make a sample ourselves, which we have done on
this record, to incorporate the sound of vinyl is as important
as the instruments playing.
Give me an example. Let's take a song on this album.
How about "Half Day Closing?" Or is there a better example?
Something like "Humming"... A lot of the tracks
were recorded in the same way. "Half Day Closing" was more recorded
in the traditional way, where there was no samples involved. It
was just me on the drums, Adrian on the bass, push "record" on
the tape machine and we recorded it from start to finish, do you
know what I mean? As like a usual band, would, which is unusual
for us.
That's where you have the drums completely on the left
side.
Yeah, that's just like an old kind of retro trick.
Not a retro trick but a retro style of doing things. Giving the
track a feel of stereo and space through panning, from one speaker
to the other. When it comes down to the other stuff, what usually
happens is it starts off with myself and Adrian and Dave behind
the desk, just pushing the chords basically. What we do is we
record an idea, which would only be about two minutes long, where
I'd be on the drums. Just real instruments, basically. Guitar,
bass, organ and we might get Clive [Deamer] in to play the drums.
He's got definitely a distinct sound, you know what I mean? And
we record a two-minute section of the track. That's kind of like
an idea that's been inspired by either a sound or a riff. And
then we mix it. Once we finish recording it, we mix it in the
sense that we make it sound like a whole track. And then what
we do is we get that two minutes of music. And then we either
bounce it down to a quarter inch machine or we put it through
some other techniques, compressor, filter or whatever. And then
we put it on tape and then listen back to it like it was an old
record, almost. And then choose the best part of it. Sample it
and then make a kind of backing track out of the best part of
the two-minute piece that we wrote.
Just as if you had found an old record and were sampling
something that you liked?
Yeah, exactly yeah. But when we record the stuff,
we use the original instruments. We don't believe in using a modern
keyboard and pushing "Hammond sound." We just don't believe in
that. If it's gonna be a Hammond, it's gonna be a Hammond. Or
it's gonna be a Vox Continental. Those [modern keyboard] sounds
are restricted by the programmer at Yamaha or Korg or whatever.
They're made to sound like a Hammond, but in reality, a real Hammond
organ has got over 1,000 sounds. Which means you can experiment
it and get your own sound or get a similar sound to one of the
great Hammond players. So going back to after we sample it. We
sample it. Then we come up with a rough guide, a backing track,
basically. Then we add real guitar again or we add more instruments
to build it up so it's got a chorus or whatever. I personally
sample it and work on it on the computer really, just as a little
creative tool.
And then we send it off to Beth and Beth writes the lyrics and
the melody. Then if it comes back and if Beth wrote a song that
she's happy with and we're happy with and everything else, then
I take the main beats or the main samples and then send them away
and get them pressed on vinyl. And then when they come back, then
I'll just mess about on the decks with them. It's almost like,
when you mess around on decks, you can make the beat or the sample
sound completely different than what you started with. Then we
sample that back from the decks to sampler and lay it down on
the two-inch and mix it, like a normal track. That's pretty much
how we work.
Yeah, that's what it's kind of about, really,
for us. The organic sound of the real instrument, kind of fitted
together and held by modern technology. It's that kind of weird
thing. People say that the way that we work is a really strange
way of working. People say, "Why do you put it down to vinyl?
Why don't you just take it off and leave it as it is?" But for
us, it's almost like a guitarist putting his guitar through a
fuzz effect, a foot pedal. Why did he do that? It sounded fine
before. Then he'd say, "Well, because I like that." And that's
pretty much the same reasons that we do our thing, really. It's
just the way it happens.
You're expanding the tools that are at your disposal
to make a recording.
"When we sample something or when we even make a sample ourselves,
which we have done on this record," Barrow said, "to incorporate
the sound of vinyl is as important as the instruments playing."
That's it. On this record, we only use two samples
from other people. The rest of the stuff was wrote by ourselves,
which seems like a logical step for this record compared to the
last one. Even though 70 percent of the last record was wrote
by ourselves, you know. I still believe in sampling. I still believe
that you can sample other people's music as long as you pay 'em.
And you do it in a creative way. The only trouble is what I saw
happen between the first record [Dummy] and the second
record [Portishead] is that the whole creative process
of sampling for a lot of people was kind of closed off. it comes
from the history of finding...being a record searcher. Going into
places really early in the morning and digging out obscure records.
Which has always been a big part of things like hip-hop, you know.
But what actually happened it was closed off. The industry got
a hold of it and turned it into a joke by producing these CDs
with 5,000 funky breaks on it for people to sample straight off.
And to be quite honest, it's a very uncreative way of making records.
Literally, this is from this shelf, this is from this shelf, and
put them together and there goes a cool track, which is not true.
It's not. It's almost like making bad rock music, you know what
I mean? OK, these are some rock chords, this is a fuzz guitar,
this is a rock beat. It doesn't really mean anything. Because
all the struggle of developing those sounds has kind of gone out
the window. And now it's like cans of beans on the shelf.
So you're saying that part of the art of being a DJ
was seeking out and finding old recordings and then taking them
and using them in fresh ways...
Yeah, but that's the important thing: using them
in fresh ways is the real point behind it. As a DJ, finding
other people's records and sampling them is not incredibly creative.
It's just the thing that you do that you love, do you know what
I mean? When you sample someone else's record, for you to say,
"Yeah, this is a really cool tune," it will be because it's someone
else's music. And you like it. That's the reason you sample it.
When you do something creative to it, especially in the States,
within hip-hop, they use it in such a creative way, they take
music from -- it could be anyone -- from the Rolling Stones to
Bach and they use it in a way that turns it into a feeling.
It comes down to the question of the ethics. Creative ethic
sampling and creative sampling. One thing I've learned from working
with Adrian -- he's played jazz for the last 20 years -- is looping
off a break from James Brown's "Drummer" is great if you can do
it creatively and you can say, "Yeah, look, I've sampled someone
else's playing here." But then to actually take the credit in
the sense of "Yeah, listen to this, this is me," it's not . It's
James Brown's "Drummer."
It's mainly because -- like I said, I've got
nothing against sampling from records -- but really it just seems
like the next logical step to finding records that basically had
what we wanted in them, was to create our own music to sample.
When we listened to records we wanted to sample, we would think,
"Well, hang on a sec, we could do this ourselves. This is a couple
of hours in a recording session, you know what I mean?" And it
wouldn't be the same. It would be ourselves. And not to actually
copy it but to actually do something that's even better than the
recording.
Kind of inspired by it...
Yeah. So in the sense of that, that was one of
the reasons. The other thing was that it was just getting really,
really hard to find things, especially in Europe. Twice a week,
a bootleg comes out of Europe and goes into the shops that says
"sample me" on it. That's got, literally, 24 tracks of unheard
jazz, R&B or psychedelic to classical to religious music. It's
just heavily backed by soul or funk or jazz drums. And because
of that, I just couldn't bring myself to sample that stuff. I
just couldn't bring myself to do it. It just didn't seem like
a creative thing to do for me. Going into a modern record shop,
picking up this thing that says "You can use these samples," taking
it home and sampling that, -- that was not all that creative at
all for me.
What do you think the song "Western's Eyes" is about?
"I've got nothing against sampling from records -- but really
it just seems like the next logical step to finding records that
basically had what we wanted in them, was to create our own music
to sample," Barrow said.
[Laughs] Oh, God knows. The way that we work
is I don't kind of ask those questions with Beth basically. I
just kind of remain as a listener when it comes down to her lyrics.
We've kind of come to this thing where, for some reason, we just
don't ask the question of what it's about. Because Beth writes
on the backing tracks. We give her the backing tracks, she writes
it and it comes back. It's just really odd to describe, but I
just don't really ask.
But as a listener, you have certain impressions or feelings
or something. I'm just curious about what you think about it.
I don't know. [Laughs] To be quite honest, I
don't think I've really thought about any of the tracks in that
way. I haven't yet sat down and really listened to it yet.
Do you think of them more as... I mean, her voice and
the words as part of the whole texture of them?
Kind of. I think it's incredibly important to
have a song that really means something. I know that personally,
to Beth, those lyrics mean so much personally to her. That's the
reason that she doesn't do interviews. She doesn't want to talk
about it. And I respect that. So I kind of step off that. So I
kind of don't ask as well, do you know what I mean? I know it's
real. I know that she's not making up just to make a record. I
think if she didn't really have a sense of what she was going
to sing about, she wouldn't sing it, you know what I mean? It's
not just out to make an album that sounds, that is a continuation
of the last. For her, it has to mean something emotionally. And
for me it has to mean something emotionally, 'cause you know you
can tell something that is emotionally personal but you don't
really have to listen to every word to get that vibe. That's the
kind of way I see it. When we're in the studio, myself, Adrian
and Dave, producing, I just purely hear things sonically without
the words. The only time that I ever get involved [in changing
the words is] if there's a lyric that just sonically just sounds
strange. I would just say, "Have you got an alternative to that
lyric or that word because it just sonically just stands out really
-- It just doesn't work." I won't ask what it's about. And she'll
just say, "Yeah, I could put this in." I'll say, "Well, try it."
And if it works, we keep it. That's kind of as much as I get involved
in the lyrical side.
On at least some of the songs on this album, "Cowboys,"
for instance, you recorded her voice so it has kind of a harsher
edge to it. Do you know what I mean?
It's almost like she sings it. If I was to take
away the distortion --it's not distortion, it's just that it's
been bounced really heavily. If I was to take that away, you'd
be surprised actually how close it would sound [to the final recording].
All we do is enhance the feeling in her voice. And she's very
much into that as well. If it's the track that really starts to
stretch right out there like in "Half Day Closing," then she really
wants us to really fuck around with her voice. It's not like well,
we're gonna do this to your voice and she doesn't like it. She's
totally into it, you know. And also, sometimes, I think she likes
the idea of her vocals sounding like an instrument, something
that's right in there. If it's a track and she's angry, it's like
sonically it has to work within the track. There's no point in
it sounding really like twee.
What do you think was the most challenging thing about recording
this new group of songs?
Getting them finished.
Why?
Well, to be perfectly honest, we went through
absolute hell recording this record. We had about 14 months of
absolute desperation, frustration because it just wasn't working,
it just wasn't happening, you know. For me, it was that [I wanted
it to] be a rounded album. To have a feeling of a real record.
A real album that starts and it takes you somewhere. The art of
actually making albums is really important, which, I think to
a lot of bands, they don't think about it so much. They're kind
of like "Well, here's your singles and there's your fillers and
there's your...." And we don't really think about our songs in
a singles way even though we do release singles. But if we didn't
have to, we wouldn't. So it's important to get that vibe. There's
no point in us recording like 12 of the same track. It was a really
weird time recording the record. The most important thing is that
it's one better than the last, heavier than the last and rougher
than the last. And that's the three morals I go for.
I chose to overanalyze the pressure of making another record
and what we should do and what we shouldn't do. All these rules...well,
we shouldn't use this instrument because we used it on the last
one and all that stuff. And pretty much it fell apart doing that.
And then about four months in, we all sat down and we all said
that we were really pissed off making this record. And Adrian
said, "Well look, let's finish one." 'Cause what happens is we
don't record one, finish one and get on with another one. Instead,
we have about eight or nine tracks running at the same time. We
all bring them up to the same level. So what will happen is we
never have one finished. The trouble is with that you never hear
anything finished. So Adrian said, "Well, look, we're all pissed
off. Let's just finish one. We'll get it close to mixing, just
get on a vibe with it, and then just see what happens." That's
what we did.
What was the song?
I think it was "Half Day Closing" because it
was like a pure recording thing. Just me playing the drums and
Adrian playing the bass and Dave pushing record. And we recorded
the track. And then we built it up without any samples and all
that kind of stuff, like a proper, like a normal track, I suppose.
And it was refreshing because then there wasn't any samples...
So once you got that done, that sort of broke it open
for you?
Gibbons only writes lyrics that mean something to her emotionally.
Yeah, then it only took five, six months to finish
the record.
Since Beth doesn't do interviews, can you give me some
impressions of her? What she likes, what she listens to, does
she read novels or is she into the record-making process...
She's got her own little studio that she works
in when she writes the songs. She likes recording her own tracks
really badly. Like playing drums or playing guitar or whatever,
making a racket. I don't know. I think she likes people like Otis
Redding, I suppose, or Janis Joplin. But she's not a big music
person. She wouldn't really go out and buy a record. Since I've
known her, I've never known her to actually say she's gone out
and bought an album and liked it. I don't even think she really
listens to music either really.
So really, music, singing and writing, is her form of
expression as opposed to her being a big fan.
Yeah, yeah. But I think that's pretty similar
to all of us. We all like and listen to music and we all talk
about music, but we're very rarely inspired by music that is actually
out now. More older music I think.
But you're someone who...
Oh yeah, I know what you mean. I'll go out and
buy a new hip-hop record, yeah. In the sense of Beth...I don't
know, it's strange. She's not kind of depressed or... I don't
know. It's a weird one. She lives kind of quite far away from
the rest of us in a sense. She lives in the country, you know.
So you literally do send tapes.
Barrow has never known Beth to say she's bought a new record
and liked it.
Yeah, yeah. But it's not like some awful music
industry kind of business kind of co-op. [Laughs] It's not like,
"Yes, we've got these tracks for you, so you have to sing in them..."
It's not made for that. We do actually feel like a band and we
are a band. It's just that she chooses to live out there and we
kind of choose to live in Bristol. We would never really work
in that kind of horrible industry way. As so many other people
do. Especially in dance music. It's what it seems to be about.
The overall feeling that comes from these recordings
that you make -- it's sort of this dark, moody, often kind of
downbeat feeling. Even the title "Sour Times" has that. What's
that about?
I think we're just not very optimistic. When
we get into the studio, when we really get into our emotions of
how we feel, when it comes to music, that's what kind of comes
out. Especially on this record, when it took so long to make and
everyone was really depressed. That came out on the record. A
lot of frustration came out on this record. That's why some of
the things are angrier, I think, than the last record. It's just
that feeling. I don't really get off on happy music. But I'm not
a very optimistic person. Especially in the last days of Tori
government in England, you know what I mean? They pretty much
crushed the life out of people in England, you know what I mean?
So there wasn't an awful lot of happiness, you know what I mean?
All your rights were being squashed from the... things like ridiculous
rulings that were just being passed by those people alone. Things
like you weren't allowed to have a gathering of over nine people.
It was turning into a dictatorship. It was just bizarre. It gave
you this impression that you've got this life. But it's bullshit.
You haven't really. You virtually ended up with music policing
in the U.K. If I had played hip-hop music or whatever and it had
a monotonous beat, at a certain volume you could get arrested
for it. Where if you were into, say opera, and you take it out
to the field, no one's gonna complain, you know what I mean? It
was completely class and kind of racially-orientated, kind of
youth-orientated, kind of laws. It was just incredible.
Some of this record there was a little bit of almost
like Billie Holliday, "Strange Fruit" sort of feeling to it. Do
you get that at all?
"We all like and listen to music and we all talk about music,"
Barrow said, "but we're very rarely inspired by music that is
actually out now."
I don't really know. [Laughs] I've never really
listened to Billie Holliday, so I couldn't really tell you. Yeah,
a lot of people have said about that. I think I have heard the
odd tune and stuff but never really kind of listened to that.
I know that my wife's got some. And Adrian's got some.
Do you think that Beth will break her silence at some
point?
I don't know really. I really don't know. Within
Portishead, there's really only one important thing and that's
making music. So if her doing interviews affects her doing music
and she's uncomfortable with it, then she doesn't have to do it.
If she wants to at some point, yeah. It's totally up to her. It's
not some kind of ploy to make her this mysterious woman. She doesn't
like doing them -- full start.
Did that come out of her doing a few initially?
I think so, yeah. I think the idea that she gives
so much of her personal feeling into those things, for someone
to judge her within half an hour is kind of really unfair. Because
if I were a journalist, heard the record and I spoke to her about
personal things, you would actually think that she must be a massively
depressed, kind of troubled person when in reality she's not at
all.
So it was bothering her that people were writing...?
Gibbons has always been uncomfortable with being the front
of the band.
I think it was they were judging her.She's always
been uncomfortable with being the front of the band anyway. Because
it is purely music, we just kind of knock that stuff out. I can't
stand being in a photo studio for five hours with a stylist. It's
not what I'm about. I'm a musician. So I don't do that either.
So in the sense of whatever it means... lack of record sales or
whatever, it doesn't matter to us. As long as we can carry on
writing music. We sell enough records so people are happy with
it and enough people hear it and kind of like it, that's the most
important thing. We can continue writing music. We're not out
to be the biggest band in the world or any of that nonsense.
I don't know if this affects what you guys do, but I
was just wondering if you had any thoughts about the success that
Prodigy and now Sneaker Pimps and some of the other so-called
electronica bands are having in America. Prodigy, their album
just sold a million copies finally after about five weeks or something,
which was pretty amazing. That had never happened before in the
U. S.
"We're not out to be the biggest band in the world or any
of that nonsense," Barrow said.
No, I think it's really nice that it's changing,
but I don't believe in this electronica stuff. I think that it's
pure record company [hype] -- it's another great label. I think
that things are naturally changing anyway. I went to Germany the
other week and I could see their music changing a lot from the
traditional rock side of things. I think it's good. I just don't
believe in stuff being called electronica. America's had a huge
history of electronic bands. They haven't just all come from Europe.
A lot of this has been inspired by the States. Whether it be Afrika
Bambata ...
Or Devo?
Yeah. I think it's a general thing. If it means
that people are gonna listen to interesting music, that's great.
But if it's a fashion word that people are gonna use to drop at
trendy parties, then I don't agree with it. I think the Sneaker
Pimps are shit. That's a bit honest, but I listened to their record
and -- it's not because of any comparisons with us -- it's just
that, literally, I don't get any emotion from it. The music that
we listen to has to create an emotion. It's not based on how wide
your flares are. I like The Prodigy because I think they're a
true, honest band.
"Breathe" is a pretty incredible track.
I think it is. But also, the ethic behind it.
I believe in people who've got ethics within music. In the sense
of it #1 into the States [on the strength of its #1 ranking in
several other countries] and [Prodigy album, The Fat of the
Land] went #1 in America -- , so what do they do? They don't
do anything. They retreat because they're tired or ... Prodigy
have got a really good belief in what they do, and that is really,
really important. They're honest guys from Essex.
Just in the way that you really care about being in
the studio and doing something that moves you, that's the way
Liam [Howlett of Prodigy] talks about working.
Exactly. I really respect people like that. Because
they see music as the most important thing. You could have, like,
a million meetings with record companies saying that this is the
way you should be doing it and this is wrong ... But if it in
any way messes up what you're doing in the studio, then there
isn't any music to promote. I think they put on brilliant shows
for people who want to go crazy. They're not pretending to be
anything else. I really like that attitude. I also like the attitude
of people like Oasis. Because they are living the rock 'n' roll
lifestyle, but they're just normal geezers who realize that. They
know how to play the game well. If they're in an industry that
plays the game, they're gonna play it back.
What did you think of "D'You Know What I Mean?" the
track, from the point of view of someone who makes records?
I thought it was OK. It's Oasis. Sounds like
Oasis. The production, big rock or whatever you wanna call it
... Noel is a good songwriter. It's one of his. It's not pretending
to be anything else.
It just seems like he was, in his own way, trying to
top himself. That was my impression. When you listen to it, it's
so big ...
Yeah, exactly. It hasn't got any hidden agenda,
has it really? [laughs] The thing about it, in the U.K., especially
in Europe, is that everything is based on trends. And it's nice
to have people who just make honest music and make it badly or
well. At least they're honest with it. We've had so many years
of like ... I never like to slag-off other people's music, but
I will tell you if it doesn't move me emotionally, because that's
the only thing I can really say -- that's truthful. It's 'in'
this week, 'out' the next, you know what I mean? Especially in
the U.K.. It's murder. And that's what I quite like about the
States as well, that things take time to develop and people listen
to records. But I hope this whole electronica thing isn't just
massive hype. Because I know that, at the moment, everyone with
a synthesizer is dragging themselves out of the woodwork to just
be signed by a major label, and they're calling themselves electronica.
The thing about the real electronic bands ... they've always been
electronic. They've never called themselves electronica. They
just called themselves ... "Oh, we're a band." The ones that turn
around and say, "Yep, we're electronica. They're kind-of the ones
that have been born because of the scene. Same thing that happened
with trip-hop in England. Us, Tricky, Massive Attack all get called
trip-hop, but we're just bands who've been called that. Now you
get trip-hop bands that come out, and you can tell they've been
born from the scene."
It's funny. Journalists want to have a shorthand way
to communicate to people a general idea about what something sounds
like. But then it ends up backfiring.
Oh yeah. It's not just that. It's that record
labels get behind it, push their new electronica bands. We're
compared to the Aphex Twins and put under the same banner. It's
either 'rock music' or 'dance music.' It's as simple as that,
really. People will say, "Oh yeah, but you're not dance music."
But we're not rock music either. It's that whole thing. It's a
new thing. Well, we've got all these acts coming in from Europe.
There's this kind of youth culture movement that doesn't watch
MTV, don't wanna listen to rock music. So we have to come up with
this new thing for it. And that's what's happened. That's the
way I look at it, anyway.
Do you still listen to hip-hop? Obviously when you were
growing up you were.
Yeah, absolutely. Still do. That's still my main
musical influence. But I would never make out that I was a hip-hop
kid.
Did you check out the Wu-Tang Clan's album?
Yeah, absolutely. The Wu-Tang, Jeru's [Jeru the
Damaja] album. I'm still into people like A Tribe Called Quest,
Busta Rhymes and Ultramagnetics [Ultramagnetic MCs]. But the thing
is, like I said, I would never make out like I was a hip-hop kid.
Because I'm a little white kid from England. I'm not living the
lifestyle. It's disrespectful for people who have either chosen
to live the hip-hop lifestyle or who have been made to because
of the surroundings they live in. There's no way that I would
say, "Yeah, I'm a hip-hop kid." Because those are words for punching.
I was just thinking last night, what's so interesting
... Here you are, you grew up in England, a million miles away
from Detroit or Brooklyn [N.Y.]. You were moved by that music,
that inspired you, and then you turned around and made music that
reflects who you are.
Yeah, I think it's important to do that. If
you're into hip-hop, there's no point in trying to ... unless
you're working with MCs from that culture. There's no point in
me pretending I'm something I'm not. It just seems ridiculous;
unfortunately, people forget that and people try it. There is
a real strong hip-hop scene in Europe and a hip-hop scene in England,
especially. In America, the general vibe of England is that, well,
there aren't any black people in England. It's kind of absolute
nonsense. London is a huge, multi-cultural city, the same as Bristol.
You've got places like Brixton, North London, Manchester ... And
these are people who truly live in the British version of the
Bronx [N.Y.], Queens [N.Y.], South Central [Los Angeles], whatever.
It's different, but it's not any easier. The hip-hop they make
is a reflection of that. Same as the guys from Marseille [France]
or from Paris. Black culture in those areas is so strong. But
even in England, I would never make out I was a hip-hop guy because
there is such a strong hip-hop scene here. It's just that the
most inspiring stuff and dominating stuff comes from the U.S..
Before Portishead, you worked with other artists.
Is that something that you would do in the future?
Yeah. Portishead is the most important thing.
So in reality, as for actually doing other things, I don't know
whether I would or not. We are a band as Portishead, so if we
get time and all want to go off into other things as side projects
-- I'm really not too sure yet. But the way it usually is with
Portishead is that everything stays in Portishead.
Yeah. And this is true? That Adrian [Utley] and Dave
[McDonald] are now part of the band?
No, they always have been.
Oh, really?
Yeah. Adrian co-wrote everything on Dummy.
If you look at the credits on Dummy ...
Yeah, I saw that but ...
I've worked with Dave for six, coming up on
seven years. And Adrian I've known for five years. But basically,
what it was, it was naivete in the music industry when I first
joined. It was kind of like, OK, well, myself and [vocalist] Beth
[Gibbons] signed on the dotted line with a record company. And
then the next thing it was me and Beth promoting, when really
it should have been all four of us in the band. And it's been
really bad because Adrian and Dave don't get the recognition they
deserve. But that's changing now, thank God. It was naivete. It's
like you don't know how much control you have in the early stages.
As a band, when you join the music industry, it's like you don't
know what you've got a say in and what you haven't. Because it
just seems like this huge world that you know nothing about. But
now we kind of understand it and that's the reason we're doing
it this way. And hopefully people will see us as a band.
I know you talked about the negative impact of success,
and that getting this album going was very hard. What would you
say has been the most positive impact?
Being able to be secure. Whether it be financially
or in the sense of doing the kind of recordings that you wanna
do. Security within your home life. You're able to pay the gas
bill. That is really the positive side to it. Because then you
can concentrate on making music. We don't go out to big industry
parties and all that kind of stuff. So to have the success that
we have and still remain sane with no egos in the band, no pop-star
antics and all that shit ... it's really nice. It's positive around
you because you know that the people you're working with care
-- the most important thing is about music. You've had this test
now of becoming successful and no one's taken the bait and behaved
like a twat.
Did anyone have their moments?
No, they wouldn't, none of it. I think the
rest of the band did too long in the turf for it. I'm the baby
of the band, really.
How old are you now?
Twenty-five.
What's your birthdate?
December 9, 1971.
Anything that we haven't touched on?
From all the hype that you hear about anything,
Portishead should be just purely music. If we could get rid of
all the bullshit that goes along with it, then we would. Even
though that bullshit is what sells it. That's the trouble. The
music industry is such a weird beast -- all the hype. You hear
the hype and then someone might hear your name and think, "Oh,
I'll go out and buy that record," or "I'm interested in listening
to Portishead." So it works really well in that sense. But if
it could be purely about music instead it would be so much nicer.
Is there a particular feeling or a particular thing
that you're trying to communicate through the music?
Just a sense of reality. Just a real sense
of kind-of ... I don't know. Just a sense of reality. Of honestness.
There's no frills. There's no clever, witty parts. There's no
clever packaging. You like the record because of what it sounds
like. Yeah. That's it.
|